Sweet! :w00t:
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/not-science-fiction-navy-test-futuristic-gun-sea-2016-n74166
Quote'Not Science Fiction': Navy to Test Futuristic Gun at Sea in 2016
The U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy, a "Star Wars" technology that will make enemies think twice, the Navy's research chief said.
Rear Adm. Matthew Klunder, the chief of Naval Research, told a round table group recently that the futuristic electromagnetic rail gun had already undergone extensive testing on land and would be mounted on the USNS Millinocket, a high-speed vessel, for sea trials beginning in 2016.
"It's now reality and it's not science fiction. It's actually real. You can look at it. It's firing," said Klunder, who planned to discuss progress on the system later on Monday with military and industry leaders at a major maritime event — the Sea-Air-Space Exposition — near Washington.
"It will help us in air defense, it will help us in cruise missile defense, it will help us in ballistic missile defense," he said. "We're also talking about a gun that's going to shoot a projectile that's about one one-hundredth of the cost of an existing missile system today."
The Navy research chief said that cost differential — $25,000 for a rail gun projectile versus $500,000 to $1.5 million for a missile — will make potential enemies think twice about the economic viability of engaging U.S. forces.
"That ... will give our adversaries a huge moment of pause to go: 'Do I even want to go engage a naval ship?'" Klunder told reporters. "You could throw anything at us, frankly, and the fact that we now can shoot a number of these rounds at a very affordable cost, it's my opinion that they don't win."
U.S. officials have voiced concerns that tight defense budgets could cause the Pentagon to lose its technological edge over China, Russia and other rivals, who have been developing antiship ballistic missile systems and integrated air defenses capable of challenging U.S. air and naval dominance.
Weapons like the electromagnetic rail gun could help U.S. forces retain their edge and give them an asymmetric advantage over rivals, making it too expensive to use missiles to attack U.S. warships because of the cheap way to defeat them.
Rail guns use electromagnetic energy known as the Lorenz Force to launch a projectile between two conductive rails. The high-power electric pulse generates a magnetic field to fire the projectile with very little recoil, officials said.
The U.S. Navy has funded two single-shot rail gun prototypes, one by privately held General Atomics and the other by BAE Systems. Klunder said he had selected BAE for the second phase of the project, which will look at developing a system capable of firing multiple shots in succession.
— Reuters
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F2x0hGojFO9WM0%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=e086c7fa6d739c7ab406805bd3dc64d4b5344559)
You would need a big gun to shoot a train at someone.
Is that pic like the rotating dancer or do they just switch direction frequently?
I am pretty sure I've read similar threads, most of them started by Tim, throughout our EUO/languish history. I almost feel like going to the past and reading EUOT again.
Quote from: Monoriu on April 08, 2014, 02:37:28 AM
I am pretty sure I've read similar threads, most of them started by Tim, throughout our EUO/languish history. I almost feel like going to the past and reading EUOT again.
I never fail to post news about the railgun. Thankfully, unlike most stuff I post the railgun has unfailingly been on schedule since I started posting about it. :)
Ok, it's definitely like the dancer pic, right now I can only see the line of rabbits moving forward.
No love for LaWS? Laser weapon to be deployed at sea this summer.
Quote from: Brazen on April 08, 2014, 05:27:01 AM
No love for LaWS? Laser weapon to be deployed at sea this summer.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fy0IjW2V.jpg&hash=d911c68dcd750b1d77c10ddac399c6f3dbabf49a) (http://imgur.com/y0IjW2V)
Lazy Tim at it again.
My railgun needs some test firings this spring. :)
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 08, 2014, 05:36:35 AM
Quote from: Brazen on April 08, 2014, 05:27:01 AM
No love for LaWS? Laser weapon to be deployed at sea this summer.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia-cache-ec0.pinimg.com%2F236x%2F48%2F5c%2F4b%2F485c4bad9af04eebcc9aa383b24c8613.jpg&hash=fb2ac237f73f2781f4fd8ceb20837817b9bacede)
Took me 5 seconds to search for LAWS.
Timmy, you lazy shit.
QuoteThe U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy,
That's a hell of a muzzle velocity.
All I need to do is think "Tim is such a lazy idiot" and Languish does my work for me.
I'm sure Brazen, being an expert, has professional references at her fingertips that far exceed the top returns in google search in value. -_-
No, You are just a lazy shit who expects everybody to do the work for you. Go fuck yourself.
I think you're taking the internet a bit too seriously.
I enjoyed flinging abuse. :)
CdM flings abuse: intraweb bully, all around nasty person
Ed flings abuse: lol good one Ed har har har
I'm a scamp.
Are you posting on Languish so's to escape from reality? Me, I don't need Languish. I am reality. There's the way it ought to be, and there's the way it is.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2.screenjunkies.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FPlatoon.jpg&hash=eb18a6490b4cd407cd1996c15f8fce8269213b95)
I shit on all you.
:lol:
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2014, 08:38:36 AM
Took me 5 seconds to search for LAWS.
Timmy, you lazy shit.
Tim probably misspelled it and ended up at an article about Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies.
Quote from: celedhring on April 08, 2014, 08:53:49 AM
QuoteThe U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy,
That's a hell of a muzzle velocity.
Still, a 23 kg projectile moving at 2400 m/s is less impressive than a 2700 kg projectile moving at 750 m/s. Advantage: Dreadnought.
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2014, 10:30:56 PM
Quote from: celedhring on April 08, 2014, 08:53:49 AM
QuoteThe U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy,
That's a hell of a muzzle velocity.
Still, a 23 kg projectile moving at 2400 m/s is less impressive than a 2700 kg projectile moving at 750 m/s. Advantage: Dreadnought.
I have no idea of the ballistics involved, but it doesn't look like the US Navy envisions an anti-ship role for those weapons. Such a short time-to-target would really make them ideal antimissile or AA weapons (provided they can be turned into rapid fire weapons, I'm really not that knowledgeable about the technology's limitations). Anyway, I when I was kid I was promised flying cars and lasers, I'm 35 and still waiting, but this and LaWS are a start...
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2014, 10:02:20 PM
CdM flings abuse: intraweb bully, all around nasty person
Ed flings abuse: lol good one Ed har har har
No one thinks you're a nasty person for flinging abuse at
Timmay--we all do that.
Quote from: celedhring on April 09, 2014, 04:35:16 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2014, 10:30:56 PM
Quote from: celedhring on April 08, 2014, 08:53:49 AM
QuoteThe U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy,
That's a hell of a muzzle velocity.
Still, a 23 kg projectile moving at 2400 m/s is less impressive than a 2700 kg projectile moving at 750 m/s. Advantage: Dreadnought.
I have no idea of the ballistics involved, but it doesn't look like the US Navy envisions an anti-ship role for those weapons. Such a short time-to-target would really make them ideal antimissile or AA weapons (provided they can be turned into rapid fire weapons, I'm really not that knowledgeable about the technology's limitations). Anyway, I when I was kid I was promised flying cars and lasers, I'm 35 and still waiting, but this and LaWS are a start...
I wonder how well they'd cope with small, fast-moving targets. I suppose the Israelis have a laser array which can shoot down artillery shells now as part of the Iron Dome, so it might be plausible.
I only haven't replied before because my office internet flags this thread up as adult content :lol:
New railgun footage with targets being obliterated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQfAcBs5vQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQfAcBs5vQ)
LaWS press release and photo:
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=80172 (http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=80172)
There, Timmy. You happy now?
AND DON'T BABY HIM BRAZEN
Christ. He'll never learn this way.