It doesn't need to be shaved bare, but trimmed short is a neccessity.
http://www.today.com/health/bye-bye-brazilian-backlash-bare-bikini-line-has-begun-2D11988259
Quote
Bye bye, Brazilian: Backlash to the bare bikini line has begun
Megan O. Steintrager TODAY contributor
11 hours ago
If you've flipped through any celebrity or fashion magazine — or, for a clearer picture, a copy of Playboy — over the past 10 years or so, you've seen the growing (or rather diminishing) trend in hair down there. Bikini areas have gone bald, if you're to draw conclusions from what you can't see on the ladies in the sheer dresses.
But recently celebrities such as Cameron Diaz, Gwyneth Paltrow and Jenny McCarthy have let on that they prefer a more natural look. Kathie Lee Gifford made her feelings about female grooming uncomfortably clear a while back on TODAY. Add to the celeb praise of the "'70s vibe" the addition of merkins to American Apparel mannequins and the appearance of a character in "Girls" flashing abundant foliage, and it seems like a backlash might be in the works.
Gwen Flamberg, Beauty Director at Us Weekly, says that while the "the hairless style" may still be predominant, "for better or worse" American Apparel has set beauty trends, and "with Cameron Diaz speaking out about going natural, we may see the pendulum swinging in the other direction."
But before we get into the backlash, let's take a look at when and why it all seems to have disappeared. Of course, artwork back to antiquity depicts smooth nether regions, while online chatter credits, or blames, '80s pornographic movies and magazines for the most recent extreme trimming fad.
"There is no real historical data," says Debby Herbenick, a research scientist at Indiana University who has studied trends in hair removal. But her recollection would place the start of the current deforestation movement in the late '90s and early 2,000s — around the time that Gwyneth Paltrow was quoted saying that having a Brazilian changed her life (yes, that same Gwyneth Paltrow). Flamberg says that Brazilian bikini waxes, in which most, but not all, hair is removed came into vogue about 15 years ago, but the "full assault" started between five and 10 years ago. Also placing the loss of even the tiniest landing strip around 10 years ago is Dr. Doris Day, a NYC-based dermatologist who specializes in the laser removal of said hairs, among other treatments.
The experts agree that age is a factor when it comes to hair removal, with young women being much more likely to go bare. "All my friends who are in their 20s have been grooming like that for always," says Flamberg. She thinks that the "Mr. Bigglesworth" look is fostered by celebrity fashion in magazines — bandage dresses, miniskirts, tiny bikinis, and other clothes that are "super-short, super-tight, and show off absolutely everything."
So what's with the pushback? First off, Herbenick's research shows that the completely bare trend was never as widespread as a fashion magazine or pornography might make one think. As for "retro bush" or "hipster bush" (two terms she's heard used), she says, "I certainly think it's something that more and more people are talking about." She cites a recent Playboy centerfold model who refused to go completely bare, as well as a newer genre of pornography that shuns excessive shaving, as signs of a wide range of acceptable grooming practices.
"All of those are positive trends," she adds. "I hope if anything it represents that women can choose to do what they want with their pubic hair."
The reasons for the growback range from practical to philosophical. On the practical front, there's the hassle, discomfort and cost of waxing, shaving, depilatories, and laser treatment — and the more you remove, the greater those physical and financial pains can be. Herbenick says in a declined economy, fewer people spend money on waxing. Plus, she says, as the generation for whom total hair removal became the norm get older and enter committed relationships, they might be easing up on their strict shaving and waxing routines. "How long are you going to do that?" she asks.
There are also some genuine health concerns associated with hair removal, from relatively minor (ingrown hairs and rashes) to more serious, such as a greater risk of certain infections, including herpes and HPV, while the skin is healing, says Day. However, she points out that these risks are "in the short run, right after" hair removal, adding that she doesn't see hair removal as a health — or moral — issue.
Herbenick, concurs, pointing out that those health risks would exist with any amount of hair removal, even just a light shave around the bikini line. "We are not really dealing with health risks — a more important concern is how women feel about their bodies and choosing what they do with their bodies, even if it's just a small thing," she says. Which brings us to the philosophical front: Historically, some feminists have shunned shaving, as have those who consider themselves free spirits. "I think that it does represent being more natural, being more self confident" for some women, says Flamberg.
Beyond the practical and philosophical concerns, there are the simple vagaries of fashion. Day notes that we're in an age when multiple styles and trends coexist — just as skirts can be short, medium, or long, we might be in an era of anything goes when it comes to bikini lines.
"It's a personal preference," says Flamberg, adding that the same rule applies to body hair as to any other beauty or fashion trend: "Wear it with confidence."
So apparently I'm not the only one who purposefully seeks out 70s porn. :smoke:
Quote from: Queequeg on January 28, 2014, 02:23:07 AM
So apparently I'm not the only one who purposefully seeks out 70s porn. :smoke:
Septuagenarians, huh. :wacko:
I've never liked the pre-pubescent look at all.
As in all things, moderation is a virtue. :P
Please god no :bleeding:
I thought Brazilian referred to getting your ass crack waxed.
QuoteCameron Diaz
old
QuoteGwyneth Paltrow
old
QuoteJenny McCarthy
who?
So once nobody is interested in seeing them much, they come up with some "new fashion ideas" How original. Not.
Nope. Still prefer the bare feel & look.
:lol: @ Tamas
Quote from: Queequeg on January 28, 2014, 02:23:07 AM
So apparently I'm not the only one who purposefully seeks out 70s porn. :smoke:
No.
I like my porn, 70s and German speaking.
thread needs pics.
In any case, much as I like the dark triangle, I'm afraid, hair trends never go back. Once women start shaving, they never stop.
Quote from: Josephus on January 28, 2014, 11:50:27 AM
thread needs pics.
In any case, much as I like the dark triangle, I'm afraid, hair trends never go back. Once women start shaving, they never stop.
I almost linked to the Demi Moore pic. Go ahead, look it up.
:yucky:
Quote from: Josephus on January 28, 2014, 11:50:27 AM
thread needs pics.
In any case, much as I like the dark triangle, I'm afraid, hair trends never go back. Once women start shaving, they never stop.
So female pubic hair is unlike male facial hair in that regard?
Quote from: Tamas on January 28, 2014, 04:57:49 AM
QuoteCameron Diaz
old
QuoteGwyneth Paltrow
old
QuoteJenny McCarthy
who?
So once nobody is interested in seeing them much, they come up with some "new fashion ideas" How original. Not.
:cheers:
Quote from: Jacob on January 28, 2014, 05:43:25 PM
Quote from: Josephus on January 28, 2014, 11:50:27 AM
thread needs pics.
In any case, much as I like the dark triangle, I'm afraid, hair trends never go back. Once women start shaving, they never stop.
So female pubic hair is unlike male facial hair in that regard?
Um....very much so, yeah.
We're talking about women. You never see hairly legs or hairy armpits come back in style. I predict the same for twat hair, yeah.
When I was an undergrad there were a smattering of chicks with hairy legs.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 28, 2014, 06:31:49 PM
When I was an undergrad there were a smattering of chicks with hairy legs.
Well yeah, I knew one, intimately, as well. But that wasn't a fad so much as a feminist cool thing.
Pubic hair should be taxed and regulated.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 28, 2014, 06:31:49 PM
When I was an undergrad there were a smattering of chicks with hairy legs.
The 50's were a long time ago, though. :unsure:
I don't mind armpit hair or pubes. Leg hair is a little weird.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Quote from: Alcibiades on January 29, 2014, 11:28:34 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 28, 2014, 06:31:49 PM
When I was an undergrad there were a smattering of chicks with hairy legs.
The 50's were a long time ago, though. :unsure:
Not that old
Quote from: Alcibiades on January 29, 2014, 11:28:34 AM
The 50's were a long time ago, though. :unsure:
Not a math major.
I was saying you were really old, like so old...because.... oh what ever. :homestar:
I got where you were coming from 2nd LT!
Yi's so old, he was alive when grumbler was in his Prime.
What hair are they talking about?
Quote from: Siege on January 29, 2014, 10:41:12 PM
What hair are they talking about?
You probably wouldn't know because your Disney crushes haven't grown it yet.
Think south of the equator.
From the Guardian, a solid feminist perspective - which also establishes that as with everything else this is about class :contract:
QuoteWhat a woman does with her pubic hair should be beyond the rule of fashion
Bikini waxes may be on the wane, but it's no business of the style police if someone still wants a Brazilian
Hadley Freeman
The Guardian, Monday 3 February 2014 14.39 GMT
Are bikini waxes over?
Melanie, by email
Well, it would be about bloody time if they were. Whereas in the 1970s fat, according to Susie Orbach, was a feminist issue, I reckon in the early 21st century pubic hair is the feminist issue (and fatness, to be honest, still hasn't quite been resolved yet, either). How far we have come, ladies!
The rise of the bikini wax, so to speak, happened in a very different era than the one in which we live now. As all historians of women's pubic hair know, Brazilian waxes became common in the US – and, soon after, the UK – when a group of Brazilian sisters, known as the J Sisters, started providing the – what, service? Torture? – to New Yorkers in the late 80s. By the mid to late 90s, they were the dernier cri among a certain type of young woman, one whom New York magazine summed up as "Us Weekly-toting, Juicy jeans-clad" (that description acts like a Proustian madeleine on me – ahhh, the early 21st century, I knew thee). Ridiculous celebrities were barking on about how removing all of one's pubic hair was truly an act of liberation ("You have changed my life!!" Gwyneth Paltrow, for it was she, scrawled across her photo in the J Sisters' waiting room – her life and, presumably, her pubic hair). And shows – including, inevitably, Sex and the City – trumpeted how trendy such an act was, and, more importantly, sexy.
With the benefit of retrospect and decades of wax rash, it is time, perhaps, to ask if it is any of these things. It's certainly not trendy any more: these days Gwyneth insists that she "usually rocks a 70s vibe" down there (turns out the J Sisters didn't change her life all that much after all). I once associated the actor Gaby Hoffmann with cuteness thanks to her youthful appearance in films such as Sleepless in Seattle and Field of Dreams. Now the mention of her name makes me think of a delightfully full thicket after seeing hers twice in one week: first in the film Crystal Fair and the Magical Cactus, and then in Girls.
It would be cheering to think that this turnaround in the fortunes of women's pubic hair reflected the rise of the fourth wave of feminism, but I suspect something less commendable and more inevitable lies at the heart of this shift. In an article in last week's New York Times's Style section, always the bastion of hard-hitting journalistic truths, Marisa Meltzer wrote about the demise of the Brazilian and high bikini waxes and suggested that "the bald look of the Brazilian has become déclassé, more suggestive of a reality television starlet than an organic lifestyle of cold-pressed juice and barre classes". In other words, Brazilians have gone the way of designer jeans and towering high heels with platforms: they became too successful, were worn by too many tacky types and are therefore no longer considered stylish. A hairless mons pubis simply does not accessorise well with one's kale, cucumber and pear juice, you see, and kale juice is just so terribly, terribly NOW, you know, what with it being tasteless, sugar-free and overpriced.
Well might you wail at the shallow nature of our world, where some people can see how tacky something is only when the woman who came third on The Apprentice talks about how much she likes it in an interview with Pick Me Up magazine. But at least the tackiness is revealed, however shallow the means.
So what, in the cold light of retrospect, are we to make of bikini and Brazilian waxes now? Are they a Bad Thing, and were women collectively insane to get them? Let's return to the aforementioned kale juice and its sugar-free qualities. As you may have noticed, there has been a great deal in the press about the dangers of sugar and how we should all go on a "no-sugar diet" immediately or else wake up tomorrow the size of the Gruffalo. The media – and large swaths of the public – like absolutes such as this (no fat! No sugar! No gluten!) because they are more fun than boring truths such as, "Eat everything, but not too much". The truth is, yes, most of us do eat too much sugar but we also have organs in our body with names such as "liver" and "kidneys" that deal with toxins for us, so unless you suffer from coeliac disease, you don't need to cut out gluten and, unless you're a diabetic, you don't need to monitor every grain of sugar you eat.
This (boring) attitude of moderation can be carried over to pubic hair. It strikes me that telling a woman exactly what she should do with her vaginal bush is about as contrary to the spirit of feminism as bidding for pictures of Lena Dunham's un-Photoshopped body (hello, feminist website Jezebel). If a woman wants to get waxed before going on a beach holiday, that hardly seems worth a war crimes trial, and ditto if she doesn't. To say that the only way a mons pubis can be sexy is if it is hairless is both gross and untrue; to say that it must be fully haired up in order to be properly womanly is similarly unhelpfully absolutist. Feminism is about giving women choice, and surely there is no choice more central to the cause than what she does with her vagina. I hope bikini waxes are over in the fashion sense so that women no longer feel they have to get them to appear trendy, but it seems fair enough for them still to exist. So, yes, I declare them Over. But they will always be an option.
Jesus Christ. Have a drink Hadley. Make it a double.
The Guardian is.... very foreign.
cunnilingus on girls who haven't shaved is disgusting
Quote from: LaCroix on February 03, 2014, 11:28:03 PM
cunnilingus on girls who haven't shaved is disgusting
:huh:
I thought it was quite a good, sensible piece :mellow:
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:39:17 PM
I thought it was quite a good, sensible piece :mellow:
It's a ridiculous rant. Who exactly is telling her to do anything? She can do whatever she wants to with her bush.
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on February 03, 2014, 11:38:11 PM:huh:
i didn't like pressing my face against pubic hair when i tried it. it was a huge turnoff. shaved is much, much superior
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
I stopped reading at "fat is a feminist issue."
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on February 03, 2014, 11:38:11 PM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 03, 2014, 11:28:03 PM
cunnilingus on girls who haven't shaved is disgusting
:huh:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview3%2F1995553%2Fhairball-o.gif&hash=29bcdf78a6e325b2da974ab686effd1fdd0ad3c3)
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 26, 2014, 10:31:21 PM
If I'm going to reconnoiter in force at the equator with no knowledge of the enemy's disposition or lay of the land, the least somebody can do is blow back the treeline a few klicks for me.
It's really not that big a deal, man. Plus stubble, which is going to be the ordinary state, is worse. Plus razorburn is nasty to look at.
That said, I'm not a big fan of ass hair. That's purely aesthetic and really does come down to a personal failing, no doubt a result of my broad shallowness and obsession with flaws.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 03, 2014, 11:49:07 PM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on February 03, 2014, 11:38:11 PM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 03, 2014, 11:28:03 PM
cunnilingus on girls who haven't shaved is disgusting
:huh:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview3%2F1995553%2Fhairball-o.gif&hash=29bcdf78a6e325b2da974ab686effd1fdd0ad3c3)
:lol:
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It's a rant for the reason I already explained. Nobody is forcing her to do shit. Quit blubbering about being oppressed.
But where does she sat any of that, far less in a rangy way?
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 03, 2014, 11:54:02 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It's a rant for the reason I already explained. Nobody is forcing her to do shit. Quit blubbering about being oppressed.
Ok, I read it despite her fat acceptance bullshit (a fad that I declare Over, because it is harmful to everyone). It's not a rant. She doesn't talk about oppression. She's just discussing how fashion is shitty and for shitty people.
Quote from: Ideologue on February 03, 2014, 11:59:03 PM
Ok, I read it despite her fat acceptance bullshit (a fad that I declare Over, because it is harmful to everyone). It's not a rant. She doesn't talk about oppression. She's just discussing how fashion is shitty and for shitty people.
QuoteIt strikes me that telling a woman exactly what she should do with her vaginal bush is about as contrary to the spirit of feminism as bidding for pictures of Lena Dunham's un-Photoshopped body (hello, feminist website Jezebel). If a woman wants to get waxed before going on a beach holiday, that hardly seems worth a war crimes trial, and ditto if she doesn't. To say that the only way a mons pubis can be sexy is if it is hairless is both gross and untrue; to say that it must be fully haired up in order to be properly womanly is similarly unhelpfully absolutist. Feminism is about giving women choice, and surely there is no choice more central to the cause than what she does with her vagina. I hope bikini waxes are over in the fashion sense so that women no longer feel they have to get them to appear trendy, but it seems fair enough for them still to exist. So, yes, I declare them Over. But they will always be an option.
What do you call this?
I liked it. :)
Quote from: Ideologue on February 03, 2014, 11:59:03 PM
Ok, I read it despite her fat acceptance bullshit (a fad that I declare Over, because it is harmful to everyone). It's not a rant. She doesn't talk about oppression. She's just discussing how fashion is shitty and for shitty people.
And the tone is light-hearted and funny. Plus it's agony aunt-ish. Asked if it's over the answer is yes, but you want to get waxed then go wild.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 04, 2014, 12:01:34 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 03, 2014, 11:59:03 PM
Ok, I read it despite her fat acceptance bullshit (a fad that I declare Over, because it is harmful to everyone). It's not a rant. She doesn't talk about oppression. She's just discussing how fashion is shitty and for shitty people.
QuoteIt strikes me that telling a woman exactly what she should do with her vaginal bush is about as contrary to the spirit of feminism as bidding for pictures of Lena Dunham's un-Photoshopped body (hello, feminist website Jezebel). If a woman wants to get waxed before going on a beach holiday, that hardly seems worth a war crimes trial, and ditto if she doesn't. To say that the only way a mons pubis can be sexy is if it is hairless is both gross and untrue; to say that it must be fully haired up in order to be properly womanly is similarly unhelpfully absolutist. Feminism is about giving women choice, and surely there is no choice more central to the cause than what she does with her vagina. I hope bikini waxes are over in the fashion sense so that women no longer feel they have to get them to appear trendy, but it seems fair enough for them still to exist. So, yes, I declare them Over. But they will always be an option.
What do you call this?
Explaining why pubes-as-fashion-statement is intrusive and stupid. Did I miss the part where she said Feminazis were putting shaved women in camps?
I do take one thing back, it is a rant; but it's not a deadly serious issue, and does not treat it as such.
Quote from: LaCroix on February 03, 2014, 11:45:47 PM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on February 03, 2014, 11:38:11 PM:huh:
i didn't like pressing my face against pubic hair when i tried it. it was a huge turnoff. shaved is much, much superior
You know, it is possible for a girl to shave the important parts and still leave a bush. Not even trimming I'm gonna put down as personal failing, as Ide put it. The gardener's gotta tend the garden if they want someone to pick the fruit. ;)
So you're going to start shaving your berries then, DSB? ;)
Quote from: merithyn on February 04, 2014, 09:19:12 AM
So you're going to start shaving your berries then, DSB? ;)
I only shave to get ready for speedo season.
Quote from: merithyn on February 04, 2014, 09:19:12 AM
So you're going to start shaving your berries then, DSB? ;)
Already have. Before you all start crying "TMI," she asked directly.
:worthless:
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It wasn't. It's just that languish is about on par with reddit when it comes to discussion about women or anything relating to women.
:rolleyes:
Very.
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It wasn't. It's just that languish is about on par with reddit when it comes to discussion about women or anything relating to women.
Um ok whatever. We have a few trolls but that is bullshit. I have had some good discussions on here about women's issues over the years.
Quote from: Valmy on February 04, 2014, 01:40:28 PM
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It wasn't. It's just that languish is about on par with reddit when it comes to discussion about women or anything relating to women.
Um ok whatever. We have a few trolls but that is bullshit. I have had some good discussions on here about women's issues over the years.
I'm not sure a a few good discussions over the years creates much of a distinction when most of the background trolling noise is similar. Besides, doesn't reddit occasionally generate good discussions too?
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 02:09:02 PM
I'm not sure a a few good discussions over the years creates much of a distinction when most of the background trolling noise is similar. Besides, doesn't reddit occasionally generate good discussions too?
I have no idea I do not hang out on reddit. But I didn't get the feeling you were referencing actual reddit but rather its reputation as a cesspool. Basically calling us all out which was ridiculous in this context anyway since we were actually having a discussion here.
FWIW my manbush is glorious.
Quote from: Valmy on February 04, 2014, 02:13:05 PM
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 02:09:02 PM
I'm not sure a a few good discussions over the years creates much of a distinction when most of the background trolling noise is similar. Besides, doesn't reddit occasionally generate good discussions too?
I have no idea I do not hang out on reddit. But I didn't get the feeling you were referencing actual reddit but rather its reputation as a cesspool. Basically calling us all out which was ridiculous in this context anyway since we were actually having a discussion here.
I'm sorry I offended you Valmy.
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 02:24:27 PM
I'm sorry I offended you Valmy.
You didn't say anything about me....
Quote from: The Brain on February 04, 2014, 12:43:31 PM
:worthless:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthumbs.dreamstime.com%2Fz%2Fpair-whole-walnuts-18176099.jpg&hash=08ce2405c9fd13ad8273b6eb0cbb6789bf15289b)
:P
See you just kind of have to ignore Ed :P
Quote from: Valmy on February 04, 2014, 04:40:08 PM
See you just kind of have to ignore Ed :P
I like to troll jezebel.com and mommy blogs.
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on February 03, 2014, 11:47:25 PM
How the hell's that a rant? :blink:
It wasn't. It's just that languish is about on par with reddit when it comes to discussion about women or anything relating to women.
derspiess, sure, the rest of us? Don't tar us with that brush.
I'm the one who called it a rant. Presumabaly he's talking about me.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 04, 2014, 06:41:02 PM
I'm the one who called it a rant. Presumabaly he's talking about me.
Rather than singling out individuals, I was talking about the overall languish environment.
But it's alright. You're all swell dudes :hug:
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 04, 2014, 06:41:02 PM
I'm the one who called it a rant. Presumabaly he's talking about me.
You call lots of things rants that aren't, nor do you take a constant strident tone on issues involving women.
Not sure why you addressed that to me Timmy. I wasn't feeling the need for reassurance.
Quote from: Valmy on February 04, 2014, 10:02:42 AM
Quote from: merithyn on February 04, 2014, 09:19:12 AM
So you're going to start shaving your berries then, DSB? ;)
I only shave to get ready for speedo season.
Remember, the thin part goes in the back.
Quote from: Jacob on February 04, 2014, 06:44:48 PM
Rather than singling out individuals, I was talking about the overall languish environment.
But it's alright. You're all swell dudes :hug:
Save it, Mr. Sensitive Ponytail. I've been arguably the most consistent, ardent and militant defender of and promoter for women's rights and civil liberties in society and the workplace on Languish over the years, but all I get is LULZ HOT WHEELZ TRACKS IN TEH BASEMENT bullshit. So go ahead, single me out.
Thread needs more KAP.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 04, 2014, 07:31:37 PM
Save it, Mr. Sensitive Ponytail. I've been arguably the most consistent, ardent and militant defender of and promoter for women's rights and civil liberties in society and the workplace on Languish over the years, but all I get is LULZ HOT WHEELZ TRACKS IN TEH BASEMENT bullshit. So go ahead, single me out.
But is that really the case? Sure, you band the abortion/birth control drum pretty hard, but that's not the only women's issue.
Quote from: Neil on February 04, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
But is that really the case? Sure, you band the abortion/birth control drum pretty hard, but that's not the only women's issue.
Yes, yes it is really the case. :smarty:
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 04, 2014, 08:46:17 PM
Quote from: Neil on February 04, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
But is that really the case? Sure, you band the abortion/birth control drum pretty hard, but that's not the only women's issue.
Yes, yes it is really the case. :smarty:
Seedy proves himself delusional once again.
So if I did want to shave my balls, what advice would you all give? :D
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on February 04, 2014, 08:54:50 PM
So if I did want to shave my balls, what advice would you all give? :D
Brillo pad
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on February 04, 2014, 08:54:50 PM
So if I did want to shave my balls, what advice would you all give? :D
Use electric clippers (or scissors) to hack back the kudzu first. Then use a manual, not an electric razor. You'll either need a mirror for the blind spots, or have your old lady do it.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 04, 2014, 07:31:37 PMSave it, Mr. Sensitive Ponytail. I've been arguably the most consistent, ardent and militant defender of and promoter for women's rights and civil liberties in society and the workplace on Languish over the years, but all I get is LULZ HOT WHEELZ TRACKS IN TEH BASEMENT bullshit. So go ahead, single me out.
So on the whole, languish is being shit to you re: discussions about women? And when I opine that languish as an environment is pretty crap when it comes to discussing things relating to women, you get all ranty and posture like you and I should have it out?
Look Seedy, you may be "arguably the most consistent, ardent and militant defender of and promoter for women's rights and civil liberties in society and the workplace on Languish over the years", but you've got Siegy levels of focus and fire-control.
20,000 Tons Of Pubic Hair Trimmed In Preparation For Valentine's Day
'Flushed with anticipation and ready to emerge from another long, cold winter, millions of Americans participated this week in the annual tradition of trimming their pubic regions in time for Valentine's Day.'
http://www.theonion.com/articles/20000-tons-of-pubic-hair-trimmed-in-preparation-fo,2909/
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fo.onionstatic.com%2Fimages%2F4%2F4477%2Foriginal%2F700.hq.jpg%3F1503&hash=797c49e8c408ca17730f4f203438b367f7806eb2)