QuoteA modern British murder: Vigilante neighbours face jail after convictions over murder of disabled man Bijan Ebrahimi wrongly accused of paedophilia
Disabled, jobless and devoted to his garden, Bijan Ebrahimi was a 'caring, loving and unselfish' man. But when he stood up to local vandals, he was smeared as a paedophile, beaten up – and burnt to death
PAUL PEACHEY , CHARLIE COOPER MONDAY 28 OCTOBER 2013
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fincoming%2Farticle8909519.ece%2FBINARY%2Foriginal%2F5_Bijan.jpg&hash=bb77f5391ef6e9e0d839413a2935a9fcbb71402c)
On the few occasions the quiet and self-effacing Bijan Ebrahimi ventured outside his drab council maisonette on the outskirts of Bristol, it was to tend to his flower baskets. He did not work – he had a back problem and was registered disabled – so his focus was on his cat and his garden.
His interest in horticulture provided him with his greatest pleasure, but also played a significant role in his death. When Mr Ebrahimi saw local youths apparently vandalising his flowers, he took pictures of them. It was a decision that would lead to his being wrongly branded a paedophile by his neighbours. One was so incensed by his alleged crime that he beat Mr Ebrahimi unconscious, and, with the help of a friend, set him alight after dousing him with white spirit.
The two men will be sentenced next month after admitting their roles in the death of the 44-year-old Iranian national, who was described by his family as a "caring, loving and unselfish man". Three police officers have also been suspended as an inquiry continues into how the Avon and Somerset force dealt with Mr Ebrahimi's requests for help after the abuse began. Six civilian call handlers are set to be questioned by the police complaints watchdog as it investigates whether his cries for help were taken seriously. Bristol City Council, which housed Mr Ebrahimi, has launched its own inquiry into what went wrong.
Police went to Mr Ebrahimi's home at Capgrave Crescent, Brislington, on 11 July after he called them to complain of damage to his flowers and harassment. When the officers arrived, a group of neighbours emerged to tell them that he had been taking pictures of children.
On several occasions, Mr Ebrahimi ignored officers' requests to stay inside his home and instead confronted the group outside, according to the police watchdog. He was finally arrested on suspicion of breaching the peace and was taken away as a crowd taunted him with cries of "paedo, paedo", witnesses said.
Mr Ebrahimi would be interviewed and released without further action. Police would also confirm later that he had not taken any indecent images and nothing of concern had been found on his computer. But his removal had set in motion the chain of events that would lead to his death. Feelings in the community were running high, with rumours spreading that Mr Ebrahimi had been burnt out of his previous local authority home. The council last night declined to comment, citing its ongoing investigation.
Mr Ebrahimi was released from police custody on 12 July. Two days later he was dead.
Lee James, 24, who lived two doors away with his young family, threatened on the night that Mr Ebrahimi was arrested that he would take the law into his own hands, prosecutors said.
One resident, who wished to remain anonymous, told the Bristol Post: "[On the night Mr Ebrahimi was arrested] everyone came out and they were calling him a paedophile. When we went into the close it was very hostile – they wanted him moved out. There were about 20 people out there all having a say. They had him down as a 100 per cent paedophile. When the police took him away everyone was cheering. Then he got released back into that."
Police are being investigated to see whether more could have been done to protect Mr Ebrahimi Police are being investigated to see whether more could have been done to protect Mr Ebrahimi
Police face investigation over why Mr Ebrahimi was the only person arrested during the initial confrontation. The investigation will also focus on the days between his release from custody and his murder.
In the early hours of 14 July, Lee James beat Mr Ebrahimi unconscious and, with the help of his next-door neighbour Stephen Norley, dragged him from his home. Norley then went to fetch some white spirit and Mr Ebrahimi's body was set alight. The killing was spotted by three teenagers who were camping out on a nearby patch of grass at the height of the summer heatwave. James had told at least one other person that Mr Ebrahimi had taken photographs of children in the crescent, setting off the baseless rumour that he was a paedophile.
Bristol council declined to say on Monday whether Mr Ebrahimi had made any complaints about the damage to his flowers, and if he had, how its representatives had responded. "We are looking into all our dealings with this person," said a spokesman. "We are reviewing all contacts with the tenants."
Other residents living in the block where Mr Ebrahimi lived have been asking to move. "Whoever started those rumours now has to live with that. He wasn't a paedophile and he's now dead. That's a hell of a thing to have on your conscience," said one.
James, who has admitted murder, and Norley, also 24, who has admitted to assisting an offender, will be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court on 28 November. The Independent Police Complaints Commission has also confirmed that three constables have been suspended and could face gross misconduct charges over their dealings with Mr Ebrahimi. Three other officers, including a sergeant and an inspector, have been interviewed by the watchdog and could also face the same charge. They have not been suspended.
Rachel Cerfontyne, the deputy chairman of the IPCC, said: "Our investigation is into police officers' and staff decisions and actions in all their dealings with Mr Ebrahimi following his call to police on 11 July until his death on 14 July. This will also include any previous police contact with him and how those incidents were dealt with, including interactions with other agencies."
In a family statement relatives said that Mr Ebrahimi was a "quiet disabled man whose only joys in life came from his horticultural interests and his cat. Bijan was a caring, loving and unselfish man. He was an excellent uncle and a warm, supportive brother."
Can't think of many cases that made me as angry as reading this.
A terrible business :(
There seems to be a rise in vigilante activity in this area http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24143991
It puts me in mind of the 17th century witch crazes; we like to think we are more enlightened but much of the old fear and hatred for mere differences remain.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Ff%2Ff8%2FBurning_witches_Malleus_Maleficarum_Montague_Summers.jpg&hash=ff3bb6f7103dd338e9fd2bd1249a1a3ab5e538ec)
Edit: Richard beat me to it.
QuoteJames, who has admitted murder, and Norley, also 24, who has admitted to assisting an offender, will be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court on 28 November.
I'll be interested to see what sort of sentences get handed down for such cold-blooded and heinous crimes. US law talkers are invited to speculate on what they would get in the US.
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on October 29, 2013, 07:19:38 AM
It puts me in mind of the 17th century witch crazes; we like to think we are more enlightened but much of the old fear and hatred for mere differences remain.
Monkey Dust's Paedofinder General was pretty right :(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaUkt59vY1Q
Quote from: Sheilbh on October 29, 2013, 06:51:11 AM
....
I think it's a direct result of the paedo-hysteria that now prevails in the country.
And the papers are in part responsible for it.
Making these allegations against someone seems quite a good method of indirectly persecuting, injuring or even getting them killed. <_<
Quote from: grumbler on October 29, 2013, 08:25:47 AM
QuoteJames, who has admitted murder, and Norley, also 24, who has admitted to assisting an offender, will be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court on 28 November.
I'll be interested to see what sort of sentences get handed down for such cold-blooded and heinous crimes. US law talkers are invited to speculate on what they would get in the US.
:mad:
Just accept it: US = US + Canada.
The plod seem to have been about as much use as a chocolate teapot :
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/29/vigilante-murder-paedophile-bristol-bijan-ebrahimi
Quote from: Liep on October 29, 2013, 09:36:36 AM
Just accept it: US = US + Canada.
More like the outcome in Canada would be significantly different from that of many US States and so is likely irrelevant to Grumber.
Quote from: mongers on October 29, 2013, 09:18:52 AM
Quote from: Sheilbh on October 29, 2013, 06:51:11 AM
....
I think it's a direct result of the paedo-hysteria that now prevails in the country.
And the papers are in part responsible for it.
Making these allegations against someone seems quite a good method of indirectly persecuting, injuring or even getting them killed. <_<
"No smoke without fire" is a popular maxim amongst the stupid so a simple accusation can come close to ruining someone's life.............in this case ending it in vile circumstances.
Quote from: mongers on October 29, 2013, 09:18:52 AM
Quote from: Sheilbh on October 29, 2013, 06:51:11 AM
....
I think it's a direct result of the paedo-hysteria that now prevails in the country.
And the papers are in part responsible for it.
Making these allegations against someone seems quite a good method of indirectly persecuting, injuring or even getting them killed. <_<
We have the same hysteria here. Moral Panics are ugly things.
Quote from: grumbler on October 29, 2013, 08:25:47 AM
QuoteJames, who has admitted murder, and Norley, also 24, who has admitted to assisting an offender, will be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court on 28 November.
I'll be interested to see what sort of sentences get handed down for such cold-blooded and heinous crimes. US law talkers are invited to speculate on what they would get in the US.
It depends. If the victim was black with a hoodie, it's self-defense, otherwise, it's a life sentence.
What a shitty neighbourhood with ultra ignorant lowlife mofos it must be.
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2013, 01:04:57 PM
What a shitty neighbourhood with ultra ignorant lowlife mofos it must be.
Ouch.
Quote from: Barrister on October 29, 2013, 09:34:40 AM
Quote from: grumbler on October 29, 2013, 08:25:47 AM
QuoteJames, who has admitted murder, and Norley, also 24, who has admitted to assisting an offender, will be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court on 28 November.
I'll be interested to see what sort of sentences get handed down for such cold-blooded and heinous crimes. US law talkers are invited to speculate on what they would get in the US.
:mad:
Noted. Change my response to "non-UK law talkers are invited to speculate on what they would get in the the law-talker's own country."
Death or life, the burning would make it a heinous crime and most likely hit key aggravating criteria in statute that would make it a capital crime. See the case of this Arizona man who, with an accomplice beat a man they intended to rob then burned him to death:
http://crime.about.com/od/deathrow/ig/Arizona-Death-Row-Inmates/az_schurz_e.htm
Has been on death row since 1990.
Are people free to own weapons over there?
Quote from: Siege on October 30, 2013, 07:06:10 PM
Are people free to own weapons over there?
No, we just have to make do with posting anonymous snide comments on the internet. :bowler:
On another forum I had assumed for some time gun ownership in the UK was basically impossible. But a UK gun owner told me that you can generally own rifles and shotguns and keep them in your home, there is just a lot more paperwork involved and regulations and inspections. It's enough of a hassle, and there is enough of a lack of gun culture historically there, that only odd ball enthusiast like this guy (he's a member of some club where you go target shooting weekly) own them, far as I can tell. I think farmers and the like own shotguns a bit more regularly, too--but you can't carry them around in public for protection like you do in the United States.
My limited understanding is pistol ownership is almost a complete no in the UK.
Arming the victims of vigilant justice goes against the tradition. Traditionally the vigilante is suppose to be armed so that he mete out justice as he so chose, that's one of the big things in gun rights.
When I lived in rural Suffolk it was routine for people to own shotguns. Everywhere else I've lived here......London, provincial towns and cities, small towns in the North.........it is almost unheard of to own a firearm.