Quote from: Admiral Yi on Today at 05:06:42 AMQuote from: garbon on Today at 03:16:19 AMQuote from: HVC on Today at 02:41:22 AM... I guess? Perhaps more worried about the slippery slope of the defence is more accurate? It's a tik tok, so I don't care. Someone is trying to get views, good for them. I guess they get money for it?
That being said just because I don't really care I don't think someone who has a view that the trend is insidious, like say Josq, isn't wholly without merit.
Ostensibly the point of the 'meme' is to highlight to men the danger that they pose. It isn't to educate women as they already know men are a danger. Trying to spread that recognition isn't trying to 'turn genders against each other' but rather maybe naively hoping that if men are aware, they'll do better.
That's a bit different than saying if someone did so with races. For one, presumably one would be attempting to perpetuate stereotypes about racial minorities. That's leave aside nuances of numbers and proportionality as I'm sure there are cuts that could show what we all know...white people are dangerous.
I'm confused. Do black men *not* pose a danger that they should be aware of in hopes they change, or they do but the greater good is to not perpetuate a stereotype?
Quote from: garbon on Today at 03:16:19 AMQuote from: HVC on Today at 02:41:22 AM... I guess? Perhaps more worried about the slippery slope of the defence is more accurate? It's a tik tok, so I don't care. Someone is trying to get views, good for them. I guess they get money for it?
That being said just because I don't really care I don't think someone who has a view that the trend is insidious, like say Josq, isn't wholly without merit.
Ostensibly the point of the 'meme' is to highlight to men the danger that they pose. It isn't to educate women as they already know men are a danger. Trying to spread that recognition isn't trying to 'turn genders against each other' but rather maybe naively hoping that if men are aware, they'll do better.
That's a bit different than saying if someone did so with races. For one, presumably one would be attempting to perpetuate stereotypes about racial minorities. That's leave aside nuances of numbers and proportionality as I'm sure there are cuts that could show what we all know...white people are dangerous.
Quote from: HVC on Today at 02:41:22 AM... I guess? Perhaps more worried about the slippery slope of the defence is more accurate? It's a tik tok, so I don't care. Someone is trying to get views, good for them. I guess they get money for it?
That being said just because I don't really care I don't think someone who has a view that the trend is insidious, like say Josq, isn't wholly without merit.
Quote from: Sophie Scholl on Today at 02:30:15 AMQuote from: HVC on Today at 12:00:29 AMMay I interest you in: PWHL Toronto?
Series comeback, take game 7 lead, only for a few minutes later tied and lose in OT. Leafs fan experience to a T
Quote from: garbon on Today at 02:36:16 AMQuote from: HVC on Today at 02:14:07 AMQuote from: Jacob on Today at 01:49:17 AMHmmm... well... I live in a place where bears are fairly frequent. I can tell you that more women are killed by men every year than are killed by bears. I'd wager that the number of incidents of women having had encounters where they felt threatened or scared by a man's behaviour is orders of magnitude greater than those who've had scary encounters with bears. I think most women have felt endangered by a man at some point in there lives; and if they haven't, they know a women who has. I doubt the same is true when it comes to bears.
Perhaps if you calculated the rate of scary encounters and the rate of murders per encounter, men would be statistically safer than bears due to the large number of encounters. But in terms of absolute numbers men have a much higher impact on women's safety than bears.
It seems only natural that this would impact women's threat perception. And it seems pretty silly to be offended by that, IMO.
My only real qualm, slight as it is, with this reasoning is that if a similar tik tok was produced with ethnicities rather that a human vs bear scenario then similar reasoning could be used to defend it.
We are now worried about the slippery slope of tik tok arguments?
Quote from: HVC on Today at 02:14:07 AMQuote from: Jacob on Today at 01:49:17 AMHmmm... well... I live in a place where bears are fairly frequent. I can tell you that more women are killed by men every year than are killed by bears. I'd wager that the number of incidents of women having had encounters where they felt threatened or scared by a man's behaviour is orders of magnitude greater than those who've had scary encounters with bears. I think most women have felt endangered by a man at some point in there lives; and if they haven't, they know a women who has. I doubt the same is true when it comes to bears.
Perhaps if you calculated the rate of scary encounters and the rate of murders per encounter, men would be statistically safer than bears due to the large number of encounters. But in terms of absolute numbers men have a much higher impact on women's safety than bears.
It seems only natural that this would impact women's threat perception. And it seems pretty silly to be offended by that, IMO.
My only real qualm, slight as it is, with this reasoning is that if a similar tik tok was produced with ethnicities rather that a human vs bear scenario then similar reasoning could be used to defend it.
Quote from: HVC on Today at 12:00:29 AMMay I interest you in: PWHL Toronto?
Series comeback, take game 7 lead, only for a few minutes later tied and lose in OT. Leafs fan experience to a T
Quote from: Jacob on Today at 02:17:32 AMWhat are you doing up at this hour HVC? Go to bed!
Page created in 0.171 seconds with 16 queries.