Quote from: grumbler on May 19, 2024, 10:05:00 AMQuote from: crazy canuck on May 19, 2024, 02:53:04 AMI see no evidence that reporters at the NYTimes don't understand what tactically significant results means. His claim that there is a lack of knowledge is based, he says, on one conversation he says he had with one reporter.
Who is claiming that "reporters at the NYTimes don't understand what tactically significant results means." Puck-Nielsen does not mention the NYT. Is this another strawman? Also, the demonstration of a particular case of lack of knowledge is sufficient to prove at least some level of a lack of knowledge.QuotePlease start reading newspapers with actual reporting standards and ethics.
Please start paying attention to knowledgeable commentators and SMEs instead of relying only on newspaper reports.QuoteThis nonsense that actual news reporting and reporters are inaccurate or don't understand is a claim that requires more evidence than this. But the fact that you and others so readily accept it as true shows how effective disinformation campaigns to discredit actual news sources has been.
No one is claiming that there are no reporters with knowledge and reports that are accurate. Stop with the strawman arguments. Contrarianism is not a good look.
Quote from: Syt on Today at 03:55:41 AMBased on the experience of every parent I know you can look forward to all kinds of fun illnesses they bring home and share with the family.
Page created in 0.029 seconds with 16 queries.