Quote from: Admiral Yi on Today at 04:59:33 PMI was ready to concede all your points (they're all good but I liked the role of the Church in medieval society the most) until you came out with this doozie. Really? Betcha I can rattle of 20 rebellions in which famine/hunger did not factor.To go a little Dirty Harry, I think the question you need to ask yourself is how much wiggle room did I mean to give myself with "basically almost"
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 04:17:01 PMSure. My argument isn't that every famine or shortage resulted in rebellion, but that it was a precipitating condition of basically almost every rebellion.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on Today at 03:56:03 PMIf anyone is curious, the grain dole began in 123 BC. Spartacus' revolt was in 73 BC.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on Today at 03:34:36 PMThere has been countryside before the evolution of homo sapiens so that is silly.I said "cities and countryside"
QuoteRome was a town long before bread and circus were provided.Although Rome was big on the other common form of ancient welfare: land grants. It also had pretty efficient ways of capturing the rural surplus of its neighbours
QuoteWhat was the form of welfare under Henry VIII?Quite
QuoteClassical Athens?All Greek city states heavily regulated grain. The role of public buyers of grain was an elected office in Athens. From what we know the city states regulated the price of staple foods and many gave free distributions of grain not to the poor, but to all citizens.
QuoteThe first Bengal famine (the one under the Company) was not criticized as bad rebellion management but on purely humanitarian grounds. And a rebellion did not break out incidentally.Sure. My argument isn't that every famine or shortage resulted in rebellion, but that it was a precipitating condition of basically almost every rebellion. Similarly not that rebellion was the only frame, but that it was a frame that justified this forms of pre-bureaucratic welfare. I think the other really important one was a more broadly conservative one that the welfare supported a virtuous, stable social order - allowing imbalances and not having a very heavy state hand could create situations of urban shortage, poor peasants and rich merchants, for example. That might be bad in itself from, say, a Confucian perspective but it would also be a social challenge for, say, a feudal system too (again Henry VIII is interesting here).
Page created in 0.040 seconds with 14 queries.