Quote from: Josquius on March 25, 2025, 08:24:47 AMBBC cutting the world service et al... Saving 1.2 million by slashing hard talk does indeed seem mad.
I don't think there's another public broadcaster out there quite like the BBC. Thinking of my experience of the Swiss broadcaster for instance- its really dry and dull programmes for a specialist audience that the commercial channels don't touch. The BBC meanwhile is really trying to be this big multi national.
Read an article the other day too about how British drama investment is suffering, the production problems with Wolf Hall series 2....depressing stuff, and the idea about a tax on streamers to fund local shows does make sense.
Big budget drama like Wolf Hall of course. But I'd also like to see more really local shows.Quote from: mongers on March 22, 2025, 08:20:54 AMQuote from: Josquius on March 22, 2025, 07:59:21 AMSeems he did
Can we set a quota on these people in parliament please
Quite sad to see him doing the rounds for these cuts. What I've seen of him previously he really seemed to be someone who actually spoke a lot of sense.
On metropolitan counties and the south coast et al.... Something that came to me a week or two ago and I just remembered. It's weird southampton - Portsmouth was never made a met county.
Oh there was a quite interesting radio programme about 1960s plans to do just that, create a huge urban complex, to be called 'Solent City' , here's the podcast:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00291pq
Shelf might like it, as it involved innovative urban planning on a big scale.![]()
Its interesting, but even shy of big urban planning the conurbation seems perfect to be a met county (weird they say its densest outside London?). There wasn't too much joined up thinking before creating Tyne & Wear for instance.
Quote from: Tamas on March 25, 2025, 03:36:32 PMI think the problem is that Trump desperatly wants to be able that Putin said yes, no matter what that costs Ukraine.Yeah I agree - that's the challenge for European leaders and diplomats - to nick a phrase, they need to heighten those contradictions between Putin desperately not wanting to agree to anything and Trump desperately wanting Putin to agree to anything.
Quote from: dist on March 25, 2025, 03:10:48 PM(And I can't say I like Lafayette dialogues, his acting sounds forced)
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 25, 2025, 03:33:05 PMI've been trying to find where to stream it. Where are you getting it?
Quote from: Grey Fox on March 25, 2025, 01:49:57 PMCBC should have a anti-PP bias, he wants to defund it. Just like it has a anti-independance bias.And he wants to use public funding for conservative medias.
Quote from: Barrister on March 25, 2025, 01:39:34 PMSo the "Poilievre doesn't have security clearance" is a valid story - but it's one thats months and months old.5-7 days ago, it was about Carney not having disclosed his assets yet.
But I want to talk about CBC bias.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics
4 of the 5 videos at the top of the page are about Poilievre's security clearance.
The lead story is about Poilievre's security clearance.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/
No stories about Poilivre's security clearance.
Quote from: Syt on March 25, 2025, 01:59:34 PMBeen re-watching some Babylon 5. Some content has aged better than one would have hoped.
Quote from: Tamas on March 25, 2025, 03:27:38 PMSo the Russians will agree to let the Ukrainians stop sinking the Russian navy, but only if in exchange Russian agriculture as a whole is freed from sanctions.Also once we get into sanctions - that doesn't work without the EU (Swift is Belgium based, for example).
It's just bleak. Every day I am trying to figure out exactly what mix of evilness and stupidity is at play with the US government
Page created in 0.174 seconds with 16 queries.