Quote from: The Minsky Moment on Today at 09:21:59 AMQuote from: Sheilbh on Today at 08:55:05 AMHe's very mass market, TV watching, middlebrow not niche online subculture.
For me the Trumpiest moment was in the dog-eater colloquy when he basically said: I saw it on TV so it must be true. That's Trump in a nutshell, truth is meaningless, reality is defined by what and who is on TV.
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 08:55:05 AMHe's very mass market, TV watching, middlebrow not niche online subculture.
Quote from: Zoupa on Today at 01:19:49 AMTaylor Swift endorsed Harris today.
Terminally online cringe divorced guy:
Why are they so weird.
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 08:09:08 AMQuote from: crazy canuck on September 10, 2024, 10:47:35 PMThe story changes through the series, as do the main players, so I am not sure what you mean by one note.I'm not sure story is even in the top 10 of why I enjoyed the Dune films
I get the story changes but I mean vibe - the aesthetic, the style, the mood and tone, the world it's built in.
I feel like it's easier to go from Star Wars (mass market adventure film for all the family) to then explore maybe the darker sides of that universe and it still works on a vibe level (Rogue One and, I've heard, Andor). I think it's more difficult to go from the Dune story to an extended universe - either the vibe stays which would become one note or it's really really jarringly different (a wisecracking Spice smuggler, say).
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 08:06:55 AMI think the reason every Chancellor in the last 30 years has vetoed that Treasury suggestion is political judgement.
But for me it's more whether it's indicative of a wider issue (and I think there's similar concerns with Starmer and the people around him). Ultimately the Treasury have a very particular view of the world which is still very Gladstonian. Part of the job of being a good minister is being able to resist your department's own vested interests and biases.
It might not mean anything but the fact Reeves has gone for something they've been pushing for years and had Chancellors block make me slightly worry that she'll be less able to spot what's the advice that's good and she should listen to, and what's institutional preferences where it's her job to override.
It's a line Blair's always flagged. I haven't read it and I won't because he creepily capitalises "the Leader" throughout, but in his new book on leadership he makes this point: "All bureaucracies are the same. They're not conspiracies for one side or another in politics; they're conspiracies for maintaining the system and they have a corresponding genius for inertia. They can be utilised and driven but should not be left with the first or final say".
I slightly worry that with their various institutional backgrounds Reeves, Starmer and Gray may be a little vulnerable on this in different ways. It's also where I sympathise a bit with the "blob" stuff - I don't think there's political bias but I think there is Treasury view/a civil service perspective and it bends to inertia
On Blair though very good to see his institute doing a big, very pro-building paper on the need to build more houses.
Page created in 0.035 seconds with 16 queries.