Quote from: crazy canuck on April 05, 2025, 09:32:06 PMThe benefits of a Parliamentary system are many. Some of you have missed the point about the UK PM being replaced before the lettuce spoiled. There are no four year terms for a leader of a party. The can be replaced at anytime within a governments mandate, have a new leader appointed, and remain in power until the next election.Or, for that matter, Canada. As I say I think in a way the more interesting question is Biden.
That encourages ambitious people who see a weak leader to go for the brass ring.
The dynamics are very different from the American system.
Quote from: Jacob on April 05, 2025, 10:48:10 PMOn the efficacy of Chinese autocracy: the Chinese system definitely has some serious inefficiencies, primarily around corruption and the risk of group think / the impulse to preserve face (for the state/ party/ officials). It is my belief that liberal democracy will produce better results over the long term. That said, liberal democracy is under attack. I have no reason to believe that Trumpist autocracy in the US or Orbanesque autocracy in Europe has any competitive advantages against Chinese autocracy. In fact, I expect that Chinese autocracy for all its faults still has an underpinning of "serving the people" and mechanisms for removing incompetent officials (beyond at the very top); something which I don't believe are features of the Trumpist oligarchs nor Orban's regime.To be honest, I think it depends on what kind of liberal democracy you're talking about. I think that when it comes to leaps in infrastructure that we discussed, it's not China looking good so much as certain flavors of liberal democracy looking very bad. In NYC city, it cost billions to build a few miles of new subway line. Ezra Klein recently put in writing what has been on my mind for a while: big city liberal governance is a great advertisement for other systems of governance, any system of governance that's not that.
Quote from: viper37 on April 06, 2025, 12:12:25 PMOnce the gamer wars starts, there's no turning back.
Quote from: Syt on April 06, 2025, 11:59:04 AMProbably combined with a dash of concern about China restricting access to rare earths.That is going to piss off Nvidia seriously.
Quote from: Bauer on April 06, 2025, 11:54:52 AMYou really went through all that trouble just for a couple city councillors? I don't think I've ever even voted for a councillor beforeI've never voted for a city councillor either.
Quote from: Iormlund on April 06, 2025, 11:09:05 AMQuote from: Gups on April 05, 2025, 04:04:00 PMIt's not comparable because Brits are much less partisan than Americans and we have a multi-party system. No British PM has had a 40% base they can rely on. 20% at best
And yet Brexit happened.
Quote from: crazy canuck on April 05, 2025, 09:15:46 PMQuote from: Bauer on April 05, 2025, 05:06:20 PMCan't AI do translation now a days?
About as well as it figures out how to impose tariffs.
Quote from: HVC on April 05, 2025, 06:06:29 PM*edit* I think I also took exception to hospital stuff mentioned here a while back about anglos not getting service, but I can't recall if I misunderstood or not.1) Anglos are getting services in their language. No one is denied service for not speaking English. Although there are bitchy people in call centers (811) when you call, and English is one of the reason why they can be bitchy. It happens when you speak French too. You have to waste your time and try to call back a few days later to get someone nicer. That's why I prefer to use the internet service and wait for someone to call me back when they are better disposed.
*edit 2* on further reflection I'm way against the monetary penalties against the Anglo universities which we discussed a while back, which I guess falls under language laws?
Page created in 0.295 seconds with 16 queries.