News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Private Sector more Efficient than Public?

Started by Jacob, April 25, 2013, 07:02:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eddie Teach

Quote from: Barrister on April 27, 2013, 06:35:15 PM
Quote from: The Brain on April 27, 2013, 04:54:00 PM
One of the many problems with the public sector is that it doesn't attract top talent.

:mad:

He means McGill graduates.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 27, 2013, 06:51:30 PM
He means McGill graduates.

There was a piece on the news the other night with American college students at McGill and other Canuckistani universities, how they're going there to save money, where they can get a 4 year degree for the cost of 1 year at a major university in the US.  They looked happy, and you could see the transformation into Canuckistani in their faces.

Josquius

Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 04:46:24 PM

And what incentive is there for a government worker to do more than the "least possible work"?

There is both positive and negative incentive.
On the one hand public sector workers will generally care more about their work. Many of them will have entered the public sector because they want to make the country a better place and have a genuine desire to help people- they could make much more money in the private sector afterall. Really depends what you mean by public sector there of course.
On the other hand public sector workers are in it for the long hall. They're not just doing a quick contract then leaving. If they do a shitty job they're the ones who'll have to clean it up a few years down the line. This one will be quite universal from the highest national governing civil servants down to the local pot hole fillers.
██████
██████
██████

Phillip V

Quote from: crazy canuck on April 27, 2013, 06:11:17 PM
Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 04:46:24 PM
And what incentive is there for a government worker to do more than the "least possible work"?

You are confulsing two things.

One is a private contractor "efficiency" of providing as little service possible for the amount being paid.

The other is a workers motivation to work.  Whether they are in the public or private sectors employee motivation is a universal issue. 
Motivation is most important to getting the job done regardless of contract.

Phillip V

Quote from: Tyr on April 27, 2013, 09:42:21 PM
Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 04:46:24 PM

And what incentive is there for a government worker to do more than the "least possible work"?

There is both positive and negative incentive.
On the one hand public sector workers will generally care more about their work. Many of them will have entered the public sector because they want to make the country a better place and have a genuine desire to help people- they could make much more money in the private sector afterall. Really depends what you mean by public sector there of course.
On the other hand public sector workers are in it for the long hall. They're not just doing a quick contract then leaving. If they do a shitty job they're the ones who'll have to clean it up a few years down the line. This one will be quite universal from the highest national governing civil servants down to the local pot hole fillers.
We are talking about services provided to the public being provided by either government or private sector. Thus, a private sector employee servicing the public can also "make the country a better place."

A private company doing a shitty job loses the contract and future business. Why would they do that? If there are cost overruns, it will bill the government, which to date has happily obliged.

frunk

Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 04:46:24 PM
And what incentive is there for a government worker to do more than the "least possible work"?

If I'm getting paid a flat salary what difference in motivation is there between someone working for a private company and the government?

Josquius

Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 09:52:02 PM

We are talking about services provided to the public being provided by either government or private sector. Thus, a private sector employee servicing the public can also "make the country a better place."
They can. But its not such a motivator for going into their field of work.
Quote
A private company doing a shitty job loses the contract and future business. Why would they do that? If there are cost overruns, it will bill the government, which to date has happily obliged.
The boss maybe thinks so. The workers doing the actual work, who as a supposed advantage of the private sector are expendable and can be fired if they demand a raise, don't give a crap.
Even with the managment- might it not be seen as better to do as bad a job as you can get away with so that things will break eventually and another contract will be in the offering?
██████
██████
██████

garbon

"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Admiral Yi

So Squeeze, your assertion is that train driver that works for the government is motivated by the desire to help others, while one that works for a private company is not?

Josquius

Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 27, 2013, 10:32:04 PM
So Squeeze, your assertion is that train driver that works for the government is motivated by the desire to help others, while one that works for a private company is not?
Nope. A train driver is motivated by a desire to drive trains.
I said it depends what we mean by public worker, it doesn't apply to all jobs.
██████
██████
██████

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Tyr on April 27, 2013, 10:33:11 PM
Nope. A train driver is motivated by a desire to drive trains.
I said it depends what we mean by public worker, it doesn't apply to all jobs.

OK.  What types of jobs are you talking about?

Valmy

Quote from: Phillip V on April 27, 2013, 09:52:02 PM
A private company doing a shitty job loses the contract and future business. Why would they do that? If there are cost overruns, it will bill the government, which to date has happily obliged.

THe same reason private companies do shitty work all the time: poor management, incompetence, blah blah.  Fortunately for them if they contracting for the government they can keep their contract by playing their politics well enough, while doing this which is harder to pull off when providing services for other sorts of customers.  Which is why I doubt it really makes much of a difference efficiency wise whether the government does it inhouse or by contract.  As I said the main difference I see is the workers are paid less...I find it weird that more poorly paid workers will be more motivated doing the exact same job just because they are in the private sector.  But I guess it is possible with a well run organization with good management.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Valmy

Quote from: The Brain on April 27, 2013, 04:54:00 PM
One of the many problems with the public sector is that it doesn't attract top talent.

Yeah but generally the public sector is doing pretty unchallenging things like maintaining parks.  HOw much super talent do you really need for that?
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

The Brain

Quote from: Valmy on April 27, 2013, 11:55:01 PM
Quote from: The Brain on April 27, 2013, 04:54:00 PM
One of the many problems with the public sector is that it doesn't attract top talent.

Yeah but generally the public sector is doing pretty unchallenging things like maintaining parks. 

That would have been awesome. :wub:
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Josquius

Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 27, 2013, 10:37:04 PM
Quote from: Tyr on April 27, 2013, 10:33:11 PM
Nope. A train driver is motivated by a desire to drive trains.
I said it depends what we mean by public worker, it doesn't apply to all jobs.

OK.  What types of jobs are you talking about?
Care. Landscaping. The railway managers.
██████
██████
██████