Father of the year.

[derspiess]

Yeah, tattoos mark a woman as impure and indecent, and someone who deliberately aspires to lower society. It is best avoided.

Pretty much, yeah.

[Grey Fox]

Wrong, wrong. Wrong. WRONG.

[garbon]

Wrong, wrong. Wrong. WRONG.

At least on that particular point, you have D and Lettow lined up against you - so you're looking good.

[Legbiter]

Bog standard rough-looking British chick. She's a looker by local standards.

Tattoos are slut tells btw.

[Valmy]

Bog standard rough looking British chick. She's a looker by local standards.

Tattoos are slut tells btw.

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

[merithyn]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

[CountDeMoney]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Which is stupid.  Nothing worse than a 40something that tries to act like a 20something, like getting a tramp stamp or fucking up their leg with a butterfly, or Howard the Duck inside her pantie line.

[merithyn]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Which is stupid.  Nothing worse than a 40something that tries to act like a 20something, like getting a tramp stamp or fucking up their leg with a butterfly, or Howard the Duck inside her pantie line.

What if said 40-something got said tattoos in her 20s and 30s?

[crazy canuck]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Which is stupid.  Nothing worse than a 40something that tries to act like a 20something, like getting a tramp stamp or fucking up their leg with a butterfly, or Howard the Duck inside her pantie line.

Agreed, although you use much more colourful language than I would.

[garbon]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Is that the descriptor you aim for?

[merithyn]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Is that the descriptor you aim for?

No, just seems to be the one I get.

Well, that or slut.

[garbon]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Is that the descriptor you aim for?

No, just seems to be the one I get.

Well, that or slut.

[Ed Anger]

Not really.  I mean those tatoos are pretty sketchy but lots of perfectly prudish boring square women get tattoos these days.

Which is stupid.  Nothing worse than a 40something that tries to act like a 20something, like getting a tramp stamp or fucking up their leg with a butterfly, or Howard the Duck inside her pantie line.

What if said 40-something got said tattoos in her 20s and 30s?

Then the tats turn into a beluga whale from all the stretching and weight gain.

[merithyn]

Then the tats turn into a beluga whale from all the stretching and weight gain.

WIN!!!!!!!!111111

Although, technically, I'm smaller now than I was when I got my last two tattoos, so not sure how that works.

[crazy canuck]

What if said 40-something got said tattoos in her 20s and 30s?

The females who got them 20 years ago are the ones responsible for the current stereotype.