News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Barclays fined £290 million

Started by Sheilbh, June 27, 2012, 05:41:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CountDeMoney

LOL, "Stop, or we'll say 'Stop' again."

QuoteEU fines global banks $2.3 bln for market rigging
By Associated Press, Updated: Wednesday, December 4, 9:03 AM

AMSTERDAM — The European Commission has fined a group of major global banks a total of 1.7 billion euros ($2.3 billion) for colluding to profit from the manipulation of key interest rates.

The banks, which include JP Morgan, Citigroup and HSBC, are accused of manipulating for years European and Japanese benchmark interest rates that affect hundreds of billions of dollars in contracts globally, from mortgages to credit card bills.

The Commission, the EU's executive arm, is only the latest to punish banks for profiting from manipulating interest rates, after similar cases brought by U.S. and national European market regulators.

"We want to send a clear message that we are determined to find and punish these cartels," competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia said Wednesday.

The banks named as participating in cartels were Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, Societe Generale, Credit Agricole, HSBC, JPMorgan, UBS and Citigroup.

In a first cartel, which operated from 2005 to 2008 and was focused on euro-denominated derivatives, Deutsche Bank received the largest fine, of 468 million euros, followed by Societe Generale with 445 million euros. RBS was fined 131 million euros.

Barclays escaped a 690 million-euro fine because it was the bank that notified the Commission of the cartel's existence, while JPMorgan, HSBC and Credit Agricole have as yet not settled. JPMorgan and HSBC denied wrongdoing Wednesday, though JPMorgan settled with the Commission in a second cartel case.

"This is not the end of the story," Almunia said. He noted that further investigations are possible and the Commission is also probing a cartel it believes manipulated derivatives denominated in Swiss francs.

In a response to the fine, Deutsche Bank Chief Executive Juergen Fitschen referred to the euro cartel as a "legacy issue" caused by "past practices of individuals" at the bank. Fitschen has worked there since 1987 and became CEO in 2012.

He acknowledged participating in the cartel had been a "gross violation" of the bank's ethics. But he said the fine wouldn't hurt the bank's profits as it has already made provisions for the fines it deemed likely from regulators.

A second cartel fined by the Commission on Wednesday operated from 2007 to 2010 and focused on yen-based derivatives. The largest fines went to RBS and Deutsche Bank, 260 million euros each, while UBS received immunity from a staggering 2.5 billion-euro fine for revealing the existence of the cartel.

Societe Generale said its role was limited to a single trader who acted without knowledge of management. RBS, which has previously been fined by the U.S. and British authorities in rate-fixing cases, was more apologetic.

Chairman Philip Hampton said the bank's management became aware some of its employees had been helping fix rates in 2011 and has taken action to prevent it happening again. It has been keeping its team of interest rate traders separate from the rest of the company, monitoring its actions, and appointing a review board.

"The RBS board and new management team condemn the behavior of the individuals who were involved in these activities," Hampton said. "There is no place for it at RBS."

DGuller

I guess they'll have to order Chinese food for delivery for lunch for a week to recoup their losses.

CountDeMoney

Not really, they can keep catering.  Business expense.

Sheilbh

Another mis-selling fine, like PPI this is at the level of day-to-day banking:
QuoteLloyds Banking Group fined record £28m in new mis-selling scandal
Pressure on staff to get 'a grand in your hand' or face demotion led to bonus-induced selling frenzy, FCA says
Jill Treanor and Jennifer Rankin

A shocking catalogue of sales incentives for bankers at Lloyds Banking Group has been revealed by regulators after the bailed-out bank received a record £28m fine for "serious failings" in its bonuses schemes.

The 33% taxpayer-owned bank now faces a bill of at least £100m to compensate up to 700,000 customers of Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland who bought £2bn-worth of products such as share ISAs, illness or income cover between January 2010 and March 2012 in a bonus-induced selling frenzy by staff of the newly merged bank. In many instances the customers did not need the products but Lloyds paid bonuses to its staff, who faced demotion if they failed to hit targets, regardless. Staff were on variable salaries depending on how much they sold.

The sales practices of 420 advisers – some 12% of those employed – are the focus of any potential redress for customers.

The scale of the fine – a record for the Financial Conduct Authority for such conduct-related issues – could lead to bonuses for past and current directors being clawed back, including the current chief executive, António Horta-Osório, who was at the helm for 12 months before the bonus schemes were stopped.

Exposing the latest scandal for an industry already disgraced by the payment protection insurance scandal, Tracey McDermott, the FCA's director of enforcement and financial crime, said the fine had been increased by 10% because Lloyds failed to heed repeated warnings about sales practices and because it had been fined 10 years ago for poor sales incentives.

"Customers have a right to expect better from our leading financial institutions and we expect firms to put customers first – but firms will never be able to do this if they incentivise their staff to do the opposite," said McDermott.

The damaging findings issued by the FCA show the pressure the staff were under to achieve sales, which in some instances allowed them to earn more than £70,000 a year, and to avoid being demoted. Examples are provided of Halifax staff earning more than £30,000 in a quarter and Bank of Scotland staff receiving more than £7,000 a month. Union officials at Unite called for all sales bonuses to be abolished.

Among the revelations are:

• A sales adviser who sold financial protection products to himself, his wife and a colleague in an attempt to avoid being demoted.

• A "grand in your hand" scheme for advisers at Halifax and Bank of Scotland to get a one-off payment of £1,000 for hitting sales targets.

• A "champagne bonus" for Lloyds TSB staff worth 35% of their monthly salary for meeting sales targets.

Technically the fine was levied in parts – £16.4m on Lloyds TSB and £11.6m on Bank of Scotland. All are part of the Lloyds Banking Group which was created in January 2009 when Lloyds TSB rescued HBOS – Halifax Bank of Scotland – at the height of the banking crisis with a £20bn taxpayer bailout.

Horta-Osório, who recently received a £2.3m share bonus because of the rise in the bank's share price since the government sold off the first of its stake, took the helm of Lloyds in March 2011. He brought in a new management team. Helen Weir, now the finance director of retailer John Lewis, was head of retail banking for much of the period of the bonus schemes.

A spokesman for Lloyds said the impact on bonuses for directors – past and present – would be considered at next month's remuneration committee. "The impact of the sales bonuses and potential redress will be considered at the January remuneration committee," the Lloyds spokesman said.

Lloyds said it had already embarked on a review to establish if compensation should be paid to customers. "We are already contacting customers, and will continue to contact potentially affected customers over the coming months. Customers do not need to take any action at this stage to be included in the review and they will be contacted in due course," the bank said.

It said the cost of the fine and any compensation would not have a "material impact on the group" which indicates the entire episode will cost less than £200m.

McDermott said the FCA had published a review of incentive schemes last year and that all firms needed to ensure they were not encouraging staff to sell products customers did not want. "The findings do not make pleasant reading. Financial incentive schemes are an important indicator of what management values and a key influence on the culture of the organisation, so they must be designed with the customer at the heart. The review of incentive schemes that we published last year makes it quite clear that this is something to which we expect all firms to adhere."

Unions argued that they had campaigned against sales targets. Dominic Hook, Unite national officer, said: "Despite the countless reports and investigations into the conduct of the banks the industry clearly has not learned the lessons of the financial crisis nor heard the concerns of customers and staff in order to adequately change."
Let's bomb Russia!

The Brain

We could use some mis-spelling fines on Languish.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

CountDeMoney

Quotenow faces a bill of at least £100m to compensate up to 700,000 customers

How positively punitive.