Ashley Olsen Spotted Sporting $39,000 Backpack By The Row

[Slargos]

Insanity such as yours should've been cleansed by fire a long time ago, Pat.

Nuclear fire.

It would be one of the few ways to be really sure.

[Pat]

Idiot en är du.
Toidi ne rä ud.

Insanity such as yours should've been cleansed by fire a long time ago, Pat.

Nuclear fire.

It would be one of the few ways to be really sure.

Reading Breivik 20:83 again?

[Slargos]

I had a roommate like Pat many years ago.

He would lie, and cheat and steal as much as he could get away with. But he was a staunch socialist, believing steadfastly in the necessity of Big Brother.

Now that I think about it, it makes perfect sense. He knows that the state needs to rule him like an angry despot because he sees his own perversion, and assumes his blackened heart is the typical condition for all men.

But, you freakish rapist, not everyone is as twisted as you are.

[HVC]

Insanity such as yours should've been cleansed by fire a long time ago, Pat.

Nuclear fire.

It would be one of the few ways to be really sure.

It's always easier to tell other people what to do with their money. If Pat started taking all the money he makes excess of rent (and lives in the cheapest place he can) and simple necessities and giving it to charity then i could take his beliefs at face value.

"It's only too much money when you're paying it or other people are making it"

[Admiral Yi]

I already answered that question, no, I don't think I have. I don't think individuals have obligations to solve structural problems as individuals (edit: except through working for structural changes that might actually make a difference on the macro level). Also, if you tried giving a chance reading what I wrote maybe you'd see I'm not arguing for maoism or castroism (sorry, I know it's like 15 lines and that's 10 lines too much for this forum...).

You're right, I hadn't read the part about wage-earning venture capitialists and democratic start-ups.  My apologies. 

[Pat]

Insanity such as yours should've been cleansed by fire a long time ago, Pat.

Nuclear fire.

It would be one of the few ways to be really sure.

It's always easier to tell other people what to do with their money. If Pat started taking all the money he makes excess of rent (and lives in the cheapest place he can) and simple necessities and giving it to charity then i could take his beliefs at face value.

That's fucking stupid considering I'm advocating structural solutions and that would be a piss in the ocean individual "solution".

"It's only too much money when you're paying it or other people are making it"

What does that even mean in this context? I don't mind paying high taxes. I'm a selfish bastard but I don't mind limiting my own wealth as long as everyone else does the same.


Slargos, I already know you don't have any solutions except fairy tales and killing people and your wishing my death is getting a bit old. Why don't you stop being an internet tough guy and take your morals to their conclusion like some of your friends?

[Slargos]

I am shamed by your noble words, Pat.

Might we sit down over a cup of coffee and discuss the subject, do you think?

[Pat]

I'd prefer tea. 

[Slargos]

Did you learn to drink tea during your stint as a PoW-rapist in the Indias? 

[crazy canuck]

What does that even mean in this context? I don't mind paying high taxes. I'm a selfish bastard but I don't mind limiting my own wealth as long as everyone else does the same.

I see, you will live according to your own moral standard only so long as others are forced to do the same.  But dont you think that the reason we dont have the "structure" you are talking about is because nobody - including you - wants to live by that moral standard?

Why don't you stop being an internet tough guy and take your morals to their conclusion like some of your friends?

Incitement?

[Razgovory]

This thread took a strange turn.

[The Brain]

What does that even mean in this context? I don't mind paying high taxes. I'm a selfish bastard but I don't mind limiting my own wealth as long as everyone else does the same.

I'm willing to get filthy rich while everyone else is still poor. I'm prepared to be the change and you are not. I doubt your idealism.

[Norgy]

This thread took a strange turn.

No kidding. 

[Pat]

Alas, no. I could tell you the story sometimes, and also why I prefer green tea. I don't like keeping secrets to myself or the world, and I'd rather suffer the condemnation of others than to feel guilty of something. I felt better after writing about that thing, you know.

What does that even mean in this context? I don't mind paying high taxes. I'm a selfish bastard but I don't mind limiting my own wealth as long as everyone else does the same.

I see, you will live according to your own moral standard only so long as others are forced to do the same.  But dont you think that the reason we dont have the "structure" you are talking about is because nobody - including you - wants to live by that moral standard?

I'm forcing no-one. l2read.

Why don't you stop being an internet tough guy and take your morals to their conclusion like some of your friends?

Incitement?
[/quote]

More importantly a statement as to his morals. If you view it as incitement it only proves me right.

[Admiral Yi]

I don't mind paying high taxes. I'm a selfish bastard but I don't mind limiting my own wealth as long as everyone else does the same.

I have never understood this logic.  Michael Moore wants sick people to have cheap health care.  Warren Buffet wants teachers to be paid more.  Why don't they write a check?  If the basic premise is correct, that these outcomes are morally superior, then why do they require the coerced participation of other people?