Breaking News - Major Terrorist Attack In Oslo, Norway

[Grey Fox]

Slargos, what's your agenda here? I'm lost at what you are trying to achieve in this thread.

What's yours?

Asking questions, understanding yours & others points, occassional attempt at a funny and social commentary.

[Slargos]

Slargos, what's your agenda here? I'm lost at what you are trying to achieve in this thread.

What's yours?

Asking questions, understanding yours & others points, occassional attempt at a funny and social commentary.

Fair enough, my agenda consists of satisfying my whims.

[Neil]

If it makes you feel better, when it comes to you I'm certain.

The way you post makes me think that it would be a public service for Raz to post the link for reporting death threats and terror threats to the authorities.

You come across as pretty unhinged. More so than the languish standard.

Quit being a cunt.  That's not a threat, that's an analysis.

[Barrister]

When did I do that?

You're delusional.

Just because you preface a threat with "I hope this happens..." or "you deserve it if this happens..."  or "someone should do this to you..." doesn't make it not a threat.

Canadian law is quite clear - a conditional threat is still a threat.

[Jacob]

Quit being a cunt.  That's not a threat, that's an analysis.

Not under Canadian law. Just ask BB.

[Jacob]

Quit being a cunt.  That's not a threat, that's an analysis.

An analysis that concludes "and thus you deserve to be killed" is still a threat.

[Slargos]

When did I do that?

You're delusional.

Just because you preface a threat with "I hope this happens..." or "you deserve it if this happens..."  or "someone should do this to you..." doesn't make it not a threat.

Canadian law is quite clear - a conditional threat is still a threat.

What about if I specifically tell him that I'm going to use my telekinetic powers to call down a meterorite on his house?

Is that a threat?

[crazy canuck]

Quit being a cunt.  That's not a threat, that's an analysis.

Please explain the difference between a threat and an analysis in the statement that someone should  be killed.

[Ed Anger]

I'm going to punch Beeb in the nuts next time I'm in Canada. How is that?

[Oexmelin]

Is it possible to ascribe genes to a country?

Not genes, but genealogy. Unless you think countries / societies /  collective entities reinvent themselves every generation or so.

[Viking]

Canadian law is quite clear - a conditional threat is still a threat.

What about passive conditional threats of the kind "You deserve to die if you do this...."

[Valmy]

I'm going to punch Beeb in the nuts next time I'm in Canada. How is that?

[Norgy]

In what way is anything made better by crocodile tears?

We're not talking about "crocodile tears", but honest self-reflection and real tears of sadness, anger and frustration. We're not talking about journalists trying to shift the blame, but to inform the public. Janne Kristiansen explained well why the Westend Mass Murderer flew under the radar, and no matter how you see it or read it, there was no attempt to blame it on the security service. I notice Gates of Vienna and assorted other wingnut sites are spending most of their energy to distance themselves from the monster from Skøyen. Maybe they're even reflecting whether their collective mass psychosis is correct?

Self-reflection is what people tend to do in the aftermath of trauma, and at least to me, the events of Friday 22nd is a gaping trauma. Everyone wants to find some answers, if only to get some peace. I'd also say that mourning is a fairly human reaction.

[derspiess]

When did I do that?

You're delusional.

Just because you preface a threat with "I hope this happens..." or "you deserve it if this happens..."  or "someone should do this to you..." doesn't make it not a threat.

Canadian law is quite clear - a conditional threat is still a threat.

How is that even a conditional threat? 

[Neil]

Quit being a cunt.  That's not a threat, that's an analysis.

Not under Canadian law. Just ask BB.

Then call the cops, motherfucker.  Beeb can try and prosecute me himself.

Nobody was prosecuted for saying that the US deserved 9/11, so I like my chances.

Besides, Canadian law (which is utterly retarded in all matters relating to free speech) doesn't have jurisdiction wherever Slargos is.  I think that you would be performing a public service if you were to kill yourself today.