News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

A short history of TR

Started by citizen k, June 03, 2011, 12:19:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

citizen k

more of a meandering rant by unashamed leftist.

QuoteTEDDY ROOSEVELT SAW THIS COMING
By Ted Rall

The Decline and Fall of an American Icon

NEW YORK--Why did our political system become so corrupt and unresponsive? How did we end up with such a rigid, Old European-style class system--in which you can't get ahead unless you were born that way? America: What Went Wrong?, a 1992 paperback by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, went a long way toward answering those questions.

It may be, however, that America was doomed long before then.

The historian Edmund Morris recently published the final entry of a magisterial trilogy about the life of Theodore Roosevelt. Though frequently listed among the greatest American politicians today, TR was an "accidental president" who ascended to power thanks to the murder of William McKinley. His blustery and impolitic style--his supporters called it speaking truth to power--would never have allowed him to win a presidential election.

Roosevelt sussed out the perils of unregulated capitalism early on. "The great corporations which we have grown to speak of rather loosely as trusts are the creatures of the State, and the State not only has the right to control them wherever need of such control is shown but it is in duty bound to control them," he said in 1901.

No president since Nixon has followed TR's advice. The result of unbridled corporate corruption is disparity of wealth worse than much of the Third World, and 20 percent unemployment.

Morris' book Colonel Roosevelt addresses TR's life after leaving the presidency in 1909: his 1912 run as on the independent Bull Moose ticket, his disastrous expedition through the Amazon, and finally the decline of this legendary dynamo after the start of World War I reordered the international landscape and doomed him to political irrelevance: a career bookended by assassins' bullets.

Few presidents are as revered by both the left and the right. Liberals love TR for his record as an environmentalist and trust-buster. Conservatives like his unapologetic imperialism: the American empire as we know it began with Roosevelt.

Although it describes events that took place a century ago, this new biography shines light on many of the systemic ills that afflict the United States today.

On the domestic front it is brutally disheartening to read that even a figure as historically transcendent and contemporaneously popular as Theodore Roosevelt found it impossible to break the lock of the two major parties on the political process. As schoolchildren learn, the Bull Moose Party marks the apex of third party attempts in presidential politics. In 1912 it was an empty farce.

During the Bull Moose run Roosevelt was shot at close range as he arrived for a campaign appearance in Milwaukee. The bullet, slowed by the printed text of the 50-page speech folded over in his jacket pocket, had nevertheless "pinked" the former president.

Morris' description of TR's grace under fire inspires awe: "Don't hurt him. Bring him here," Roosevelt shouted to men restraining his would-be assassin as he hoisted himself to his feet.

"Let's go the hospital," urged an aide.

"You get me to that speech," Roosevelt replied, Morris says, "with a savage rasp to his voice."

"[The bullet wound] was a ragged, dime-sized hole, bleeding slowly, about an inch below and to the right of his right nipple. The bullet was nowhere to be seen or palpated. The whole right side of his body had turned black," Morris writes.

TR took the podium. "It takes more than that to kill a bull moose," he said, going on to speak for an hour and fifteen minutes.

We have lost so much. Contrast TR's courageous performance after being shot to our so-called "leaders." On 9/11 George W. Bush abandoned Washington, fleeing into internal exile, hopscotching the nation like a coward before slinking back to the capital half a day later.

Roosevelt spent his last years hurling scathing critiques of Woodrow Wilson's reluctance to enter World War I on the side of Britain and France. Nearly 100 years ago, however, the bellicose Roosevelt harbored no proto-neocon-like delusions about American exceptionalism--the nauseating combination of high-blown rhetoric and gutter-rat real-world actions that characterizes foreign policy of the United States and sparks outrage around the globe.

"He scoffed at the hypocrisy of Wilson's grand-sounding phrase 'self-determination for all peoples' [in Wilson's Fourteen Points], noting that the President was in no hurry to grant liberty to Haiti or Santo Domingo." Both were under U.S. military occupation.

Were such self-awareness in greater supply in the U.S. today, we might not be fighting wars of aggression on three fronts at the same time we're lecturing other countries about sovereignty and human rights.

Roosevelt's martial spirit was his blind spot.

Unlike most Americans today, he had served valiantly. His bravery was unquestioned. One of his greatest disappointments was Wilson's refusal to allow him to fight in the Great War.

Despite his experience in battle TR shared with today's armchair "support our troops" "U-S-A" warriors an excess of willingness to send others to face shells and poison gas--without fully internalizing the consequences.

Despite being sidelined, Roosevelt pushed his sons to enlist and get to the fighting. Then his son Quentin, a pilot, got shot down. "Quentin's mother and I are very glad that he got to the Front and had a chance to render some service to his country, and to show the stuff there was in him before his fate befell him," he told the press.

But the cold reality of Quentin's permanent absence marked the beginning of the end of a man known for his vigor. "The old side of him is gone, the old exuberance, the boy in him has died," a friend noted the day after he learned of his son's death. "I am not what I was," TR confessed to his sister.

Two years later Roosevelt was dead, a victim of the American militarism he extolled and symbolized.

(Ted Rall is the author of "The Anti-American Manifesto." His website is tedrall.com.)

[/i]

jimmy olsen

Don't insult the left by associating it with him, Ted Rall is an unashamed nutcase.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

MadImmortalMan

Gotta agree with Tim. Rall is a shit-flinger, and he sure as hell doesn't represent the left.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Razgovory

#3
He's the guy who makes those crap cartoons, right?  Total kook.

EDIT:  Also I don't think conservatives (if I may speak for them for a moment) like T.R. for Imperialism, something that doesn't really make much sense anyway since we didn't conquer a great deal while he was President.  In fact, I've seen many conservative intellectuals make efforts to explain away the US colonial possessions as aberrations.  I bet some conservatives admire some of his conservation efforts as well.  They probably like national parks as much as anyone.

I think calling Bush a coward is uncalled for.  From what I gathered he followed plans that were already in place.  I hardly expect him to fly to the White House, which for all he knew was under attack.

Looking over the article again, it's a pretty piss poor piece of work.  He's all over the place here, starting the article about political corruption, rigid class structure and corporate cronyism and ending on Roosevelt dying as a victim of his own militarism.  What does one have to do with the other?  I'm not following the argument I guess.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Admiral Yi

He also confuses trust busting with pure and simple corporation bashing.

Razgovory

Quote from: Admiral Yi on June 03, 2011, 01:35:25 AM
He also confuses trust busting with pure and simple corporation bashing.

Yeah, I noticed that as well.  TR was not against corporations.  He worked as a lawyer serving some I think.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

CountDeMoney

Ted Rall has been insane since the 2000 election, and 9/11 pushed him over the edge.

The Minsky Moment

QuoteHis blustery and impolitic style--his supporters called it speaking truth to power--would never have allowed him to win a presidential election.

Did 1904 never happen?  :rolleyes:
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Valmy

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on June 03, 2011, 08:47:36 AM
QuoteHis blustery and impolitic style--his supporters called it speaking truth to power--would never have allowed him to win a presidential election.

Did 1904 never happen?  :rolleyes:

That and he was incredibly popular because of that blustery and impolitic style.  If the Republicans had allowed his nomination to go through in 1912 he would have won.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Kleves

If death had allowed his nomination to go through in 1920, he probably would have won then, too.
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

jimmy olsen

If he had run for a third time in '08 he would have won then too.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Caliga

Lost all credibility with the 9/11 crack at Bush.  Bush getting himself killed wouldn't have been very productive (remember, at the time the scope of the threat was totally unknown).
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

KRonn

Quote from: Caliga on June 03, 2011, 10:38:02 AM
Lost all credibility with the 9/11 crack at Bush.  Bush getting himself killed wouldn't have been very productive (remember, at the time the scope of the threat was totally unknown).
Yeah, a gratuitous slam for no good reason. Would have been an error to sit in the White House while unknown attacks are coming in. Better to be in Air Force One or at a hidden, secure Command Center.

KRonn

Quote from: Razgovory on June 03, 2011, 01:08:27 AM

EDIT:  Also I don't think conservatives (if I may speak for them for a moment) like T.R. for Imperialism, something that doesn't really make much sense anyway since we didn't conquer a great deal while he was President.  In fact, I've seen many conservative intellectuals make efforts to explain away the US colonial possessions as aberrations.  I bet some conservatives admire some of his conservation efforts as well.  They probably like national parks as much as anyone.

I think calling Bush a coward is uncalled for.  From what I gathered he followed plans that were already in place.  I hardly expect him to fly to the White House, which for all he knew was under attack.

Agreed. Conservation isn't just for Liberals, and many Conservatives are against the US doing too much involvement in foreign affairs unless not directly national security or some such. Like Pat Buchanan or Ron Paul for example, though that may be more Libertarian instead, at least for Paul.

As for bashing Bush over leaving the White House at 9/11, that's just senseless bashing. Much better for a President to be away from a possible target site.