News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The NEW New Boardgames Thread

Started by CountDeMoney, April 21, 2011, 09:14:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

crazy canuck

Agreed! that would be very interesting.
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

Oexmelin

Any recommendation for a three player board game? It's not a frequent player count in my group.
Que le grand cric me croque !

The Brain

Quote from: Oexmelin on February 05, 2026, 07:43:16 PMAny recommendation for a three player board game? It's not a frequent player count in my group.

Generally for three players I think coop (or semi-coop) is a good choice, if the group enjoys such games.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

frunk


Darth Wagtaros

Do Mandroids Dream of Eclectic Sheep?

The Minsky Moment

WW2 strat games can usually be divided Allies, Axis, Soviet.  Anything from Quartermaster General to World in Flames.  Triumph & Tragedy and Churchill are both recent releases tuned for 3.
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson

Oexmelin

Maria is a great game, and great idea - but with this specific configuration of players, we tend to focus more on different styles/types. 

Unsurprisingly, perhaps, Maria gets more play with students, because it's mostly young men who join our historical board game nights. This group is faculty (usually 4 or 5), and it's usually made up of specialists of much older periods (and, in fact, a majority of women), who tend to get less interested by WW2 or, indeed, wargames: two archeologists, a specialist of 20th century women's history, a medievalist, and I. I've had a lot more success with economic conflicts or competition envisioned in a different "way" (e.g. Tammany Hall, Hansa Teutonica) but I am unsure how these play at 3 players. Maybe Inis?

Interestingly, it was the same back in the US, albeit with a different group of faculty + their partners. As a result, I tend to have very few WW2 games. It may indeed reflect the relative indifference towards military history in academia.
Que le grand cric me croque !

Oexmelin

Quote from: frunk on Today at 07:04:43 AMEnd of the Triumvirate[/url].

I've been meaning to try that. No one in our group owns it though. :(
Que le grand cric me croque !

frunk

Hansa Teutonica works fine at 3 players.  I don't really like the game but I've played it with 3 and it works just as well as with more.

Other ideas:
Indonesia
Slay the Spire: The Board Game - Only if everyone has played the computer game, otherwise there will be way too many concepts to explain.
Revive, Ark Nova - I think both of these are better with 3 than 4, way too slow at 4.

Most Tom Lehman games work well at 3 player, Race for the Galaxy, Dice Realms, Res Arcana, Phoenicia.
Phoenicia is unique in that it's an auction game that works well over its full player count range (2-5).

Baron von Schtinkenbutt

Quote from: Oexmelin on Today at 12:09:34 PMUnsurprisingly, perhaps, Maria gets more play with students, because it's mostly young men who join our historical board game nights. This group is faculty (usually 4 or 5), and it's usually made up of specialists of much older periods (and, in fact, a majority of women), who tend to get less interested by WW2 or, indeed, wargames: two archeologists, a specialist of 20th century women's history, a medievalist, and I. I've had a lot more success with economic conflicts or competition envisioned in a different "way" (e.g. Tammany Hall, Hansa Teutonica) but I am unsure how these play at 3 players. Maybe Inis?

Manifest Destiny might be a good choice then.  I haven't played it yet, though, since I can't find two other people willing to. :P

bogh

Triumph & Tragedy is fun (it sort of breaks at some point, but until then).

Brotherhood & Unity depicts the three way conflict between Serbs, Croats and Muslims in Bosnia. Highly recommended.

Oexmelin

Quote from: bogh on Today at 03:05:55 PMTriumph & Tragedy is fun (it sort of breaks at some point, but until then).

Brotherhood & Unity depicts the three way conflict between Serbs, Croats and Muslims in Bosnia. Highly recommended.

Thanks! We have a lecturer whose PhD thesis was on the war in Yugoslavia. I think she'll be eager to try.
Que le grand cric me croque !

Oexmelin

Quote from: frunk on Today at 12:51:47 PMHansa Teutonica works fine at 3 players.  I don't really like the game but I've played it with 3 and it works just as well as with more.

Other ideas:
Indonesia
Slay the Spire: The Board Game - Only if everyone has played the computer game, otherwise there will be way too many concepts to explain.
Revive, Ark Nova - I think both of these are better with 3 than 4, way too slow at 4.

Most Tom Lehman games work well at 3 player, Race for the Galaxy, Dice Realms, Res Arcana, Phoenicia.
Phoenicia is unique in that it's an auction game that works well over its full player count range (2-5).


Thanks!
Que le grand cric me croque !

bogh

Brotherhood & Unity plays really well and has lots of historical interesting bits. Designed by a local with a very strong grasp of the war and some of its peculiar dynamics.

Pax Pamir plays well with three as well. And again with a slightly esoteric theme.

Darth Wagtaros



I almost wanna play this. But not enough to actually play it.
Do Mandroids Dream of Eclectic Sheep?