News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Question about the Electoral College

Started by jimmy olsen, April 22, 2010, 10:22:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

alfred russel

Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 25, 2010, 09:33:59 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 25, 2010, 09:27:25 AM
WTF is Clark and what happened to Woodrow Wilson?
The whole point of this is to run the election without Wilson, who was Progressive and a good campaigner. Clark was the Democratic Speaker of the House, a man perceived as more conservative and pro-business. He was the favorite for the nomination in 1912. Bryan wouldn't accept him and threw his support to Wilson. If Wilson doesn't run for some reason (worse stroke in 1906 for example), then he'd almost certainly be the nominee.

So this thread is a ruse to get us to help with an alternative history discussion?
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

garbon

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 25, 2010, 09:27:25 AM
WTF is Clark and what happened to Woodrow Wilson?

Tim already said Wilson would be out. :rolleyes:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Agelastus

Quote from: alfred russel on April 25, 2010, 10:12:36 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 25, 2010, 09:33:59 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 25, 2010, 09:27:25 AM
WTF is Clark and what happened to Woodrow Wilson?
The whole point of this is to run the election without Wilson, who was Progressive and a good campaigner. Clark was the Democratic Speaker of the House, a man perceived as more conservative and pro-business. He was the favorite for the nomination in 1912. Bryan wouldn't accept him and threw his support to Wilson. If Wilson doesn't run for some reason (worse stroke in 1906 for example), then he'd almost certainly be the nominee.

So this thread is a ruse to get us to help with an alternative history discussion?

Not surprising - Tim's more into alternate history than I am, and I seem to be tinkering every couple of weeks or so with the Washington Treaty for various personal HOI mods.
"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

dps

Quote from: alfred russel on April 25, 2010, 10:12:36 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 25, 2010, 09:33:59 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 25, 2010, 09:27:25 AM
WTF is Clark and what happened to Woodrow Wilson?
The whole point of this is to run the election without Wilson, who was Progressive and a good campaigner. Clark was the Democratic Speaker of the House, a man perceived as more conservative and pro-business. He was the favorite for the nomination in 1912. Bryan wouldn't accept him and threw his support to Wilson. If Wilson doesn't run for some reason (worse stroke in 1906 for example), then he'd almost certainly be the nominee.

So this thread is a ruse to get us to help with an alternative history discussion?

The worst thing is, he started out by asking about laws restricting the freedom of electors.  Even if those laws were to be found constitutional, everyone was telling him about current laws--which basically hadn't been enacted in 1912.

Capetan Mihali

"The internet's completely over. [...] The internet's like MTV. At one time MTV was hip and suddenly it became outdated. Anyway, all these computers and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with numbers and that can't be good for you."
-- Prince, 2010. (R.I.P.)

garbon

"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.