News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Started by Barrister, November 15, 2024, 11:22:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Barrister

Quote from: HVC on November 15, 2024, 02:52:01 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 15, 2024, 02:34:42 PM
Quote from: HVC on November 15, 2024, 02:31:15 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 15, 2024, 02:23:43 PMTyson biting Holyfield was over 25 years ago.  He's a much older man now.

Fair enough. I still think that crazy leopards don't change their spots.  But I guess we'll see. Well, I won't, since I'm not watching, but I'll probably watch clips :D

Maybe not change their spots, but 100% people slow down.

I see that in my job all the time.  All these criminal hell-raisers tend to just age out of the criminal justice system by their mid-40s.

That's where steroids come into play :lol:

It *is* a sanctioned fight though.  So I won't say there won't be any steroids (and, at age 58, Tyson might be able to legally get some anyways) but it's not going to be the wild west.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

HVC

It started, for those so inclined.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

HisMajestyBOB

Maybe they can both lose.  :)
Three lovely Prada points for HoI2 help

Admiral Yi

I'm with Rogan.  Anything but a KO of Tyson please.

crazy canuck

Spoiler




On the upside the fix was not in.  It was a real boxing match, except the rounds were reduced from 3 to 2 minutes.  If it had been 3 Tyson would not have lasted long.

It was what you would expect when a 58 year old fights a younger man at his physical peek.

One of the commentators summed it up nicely in the fourth round - " this is hard to watch"

Josquius

Sounds like it was a terrible advert for attracting new fans to boxing.
██████
██████
██████