The Banking Crisis Reappraised - Bonfire of the "Assholes"

Started by The Minsky Moment, July 21, 2009, 08:47:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

DGuller

Quote from: Jos Theelen on July 21, 2009, 08:58:13 AM
It seems to me that the problem is not greed, but the fact that we have to bail out those banks to keep the economy running. If we find a way so that all those greedy banks can go broke, the problem wouldn't be so serious.
I agree, I think that's the main goal.  Make it so that banks can indeed fail, because otherwise lemon socialism is the worst of both worlds.  Bernanke has said the same thing, so hopefully he'll do something in that direction.

Ed Anger

Quote from: Norgy on July 21, 2009, 09:25:56 AM
And don't even get me started on Ed.



:D

I would have been an excellent cog in the nazi machine. Stamp this, shuffle that. Scream at underlings.

Easy peasy.
Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

Caliga

Quote from: Ed Anger on July 21, 2009, 09:44:39 AM
I would have been an excellent cog in the nazi machine. Stamp this, shuffle that. Scream at underlings.

Easy peasy.
Well, you have plenty of practice with "VERE ISHT STEINER!!!11111111oneoneone" :hug:
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Valmy

Quote from: Caliga on July 21, 2009, 09:48:47 AM
Well, you have plenty of practice with "VERE ISHT STEINER!!!11111111oneoneone" :hug:

Mein Fuehrer...Steiner....Steiner got you banned from X-Box live.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Caliga

Quote from: Valmy on July 21, 2009, 09:52:53 AM
Quote from: Caliga on July 21, 2009, 09:48:47 AM
Well, you have plenty of practice with "VERE ISHT STEINER!!!11111111oneoneone" :hug:

Mein Fuehrer...Steiner....Steiner got you banned from X-Box live.
I kinda liked the recent "Mein Fuehrer... Jacko... Jacko has died.  He cannot do your birthday concert" one.
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Norgy

Now you get me all worked up to Dr. Merkwurdigliebe again.  :mad:

Jos Theelen

Quote from: Caliga on July 21, 2009, 09:06:25 AM
Quote from: Jos Theelen on July 21, 2009, 08:58:13 AM
If we find a way so that all those greedy banks can go broke, the problem wouldn't be so serious.
All those greedy banks = all banks.  :cool:

Suppose we forbid banks to become big (max capital or some other regulation). Then I have no problem when they become greedy. If they fail they are out, and we won't miss them.

grumbler

Quote from: Norgy on July 21, 2009, 10:05:17 AM
Now you get me all worked up to Dr. Merkwurdigliebe again.  :mad:
Why :mad:?  Its worth watching many, many times.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Norgy on July 21, 2009, 09:20:28 AMManagement would include people like you, me and Caliga. Colour me unimpressed.

I'm a fantastic manager.
Fortunately for the massively bureaucratic and dyfunctional organizational culture I operate in, the fact that I am efficient, direct and possess little tolerance for their bullshit when it comes to getting shit done means that I will either A) eventually stroke out, or B) quit.

DontSayBanana

Quote from: Jos Theelen on July 21, 2009, 02:42:53 PM
Suppose we forbid banks to become big (max capital or some other regulation). Then I have no problem when they become greedy. If they fail they are out, and we won't miss them.

Lochner Doctrine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lochner_v._New_York

I'm in general agreement, though. Neither the size nor the corporate culture alone are the problem; if we were going to cap anything, I'd suggest capping hedging- Goldman Sachs was supposedly hedged, but there's a huge argument running as to whether they could have ever backed up the claim without government assistance.

FDIC's insurability limit seems to have helped stabilize retail operations for banks, so while the financial whizzes might be irked at the loss of one more way to make copious amounts of money, I don't see why we wouldn't get a similar effect from the CFTC capping hedging agreements.
Experience bij!

derspiess

Quote from: Jos Theelen on July 21, 2009, 02:42:53 PM
Suppose we forbid banks to become big (max capital or some other regulation). Then I have no problem when they become greedy. If they fail they are out, and we won't miss them.

Anything you try will end up hurting the people you're trying to protect :)
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Jos Theelen

Quote from: DontSayBanana on July 21, 2009, 10:20:42 PM
Quote from: Jos Theelen on July 21, 2009, 02:42:53 PM
Suppose we forbid banks to become big (max capital or some other regulation). Then I have no problem when they become greedy. If they fail they are out, and we won't miss them.

Lochner Doctrine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lochner_v._New_York

I'm in general agreement, though. Neither the size nor the corporate culture alone are the problem; if we were going to cap anything, I'd suggest capping hedging- Goldman Sachs was supposedly hedged, but there's a huge argument running as to whether they could have ever backed up the claim without government assistance.

FDIC's insurability limit seems to have helped stabilize retail operations for banks, so while the financial whizzes might be irked at the loss of one more way to make copious amounts of money, I don't see why we wouldn't get a similar effect from the CFTC capping hedging agreements.

That's OK to me, as long as we create banks that can go broke. I am not sure your proposal does that, but if it does it, great idea.