News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Gates: Army to get 22,000 more troops

Started by jimmy olsen, July 20, 2009, 08:40:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

Good,. It still boogles my mind how long the Bush administration refused to expand the army. They should have done so immediately after 9/11.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32011579/ns/us_news-military/
QuoteGates: Army to get 22,000 more troops
Defense secretary says more soldiers needed for ongoing operations

updated 4:03 p.m. ET, Mon., July 20, 2009

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Monday that the size of the Army is being increased temporarily by 22,000 soldiers to help meet the needs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other missions around the world.

This is the second time since 2007 that the military has determined it doesn't have a large enough force. Gates had already increased the size of the Army and Marine Corps shortly after taking the Pentagon job.

Gates noted that while progress in Iraq will lead to a reduction in the number of troops there, more troops are needed in Afghanistan because of the worsening violence in that conflict. He said the persistent pace of operations in the two wars over several years has meant a steady increase in the number of troops who are wounded, stressed or otherwise unable to deploy with their units.

Also causing a shortage is the decision earlier this year to stop the unpopular practice of keeping troops beyond their enlistment dates, a practice known as "stop-loss."

"The cumulative effect of these factors is that the army faces a period where its ability to continue to deploy combat units (with enough troops) is at risk," Gates said.

"This is a temporary challenge that will peak in the coming year and abate over the course of the next three years," Gates told a Pentagon press conference.

The Army currently has a total troop strength of 547,000.


'Tough choices'
Gates said he would not seek additional money for the extra troops in the 2009 and 2010 fiscal year budgets.

"This decision will result in additional tough choices for the department," he said. "However, I'm convinced that this is an important and necessary step to ensure that we continue to properly support the needs of our commanders in the field while providing relief for our current force and their families."

Gates also said it was "not inevitable" that more U.S. troops would be needed in Afghanistan beyond the 68,000 American force expected to be there by the end of the year.

He had said Thursday that there "may be some increase, but not a lot."

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took over as commander for all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan last month, is nearing the end of a 60-day review of what is needed there. The former U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, had said he needed an additional 10,000 troops, beyond the 68,000. The White House put off that decision until the end of this year.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

CountDeMoney

Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:40:41 PMIt still boogles my mind how long the Bush administration refused to expand the army. They should have done so immediately after 9/11.

You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have.   Douche.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 20, 2009, 08:52:01 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:40:41 PMIt still boogles my mind how long the Bush administration refused to expand the army. They should have done so immediately after 9/11.

You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have.   Douche.
The army he had was fine for war in Afghanistan, but he already knew he was going to fight Iraq as well, and he had time to prepare for it, but chose not to.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

FunkMonk

22,000 !1?!?!?!  :w00t: Promotions here I come.
Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:53:51 PMThe army he had was fine for war in Afghanistan, but he already knew he was going to fight Iraq as well, and he had time to prepare for it, but chose not to.

You are a neocon failbot.  HOW DAR U QUESTION TEH RUMMY

FunkMonk

Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

Hansmeister

Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:53:51 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 20, 2009, 08:52:01 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:40:41 PMIt still boogles my mind how long the Bush administration refused to expand the army. They should have done so immediately after 9/11.

You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have.   Douche.
The army he had was fine for war in Afghanistan, but he already knew he was going to fight Iraq as well, and he had time to prepare for it, but chose not to.

The Army was too fixated on a heavy reliance on technology over manpower.  They believed a "network-centric" redesign would mean we could actually reduce the Army's manpower and invest it in the FCS instead.  The Army was wrong, but it took a few years to weed out the bad ideas dreamt up by the Generals.