What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

[merithyn]

Makes sense. It's a very Ronald Reagan thing to do. Cut taxes to the rich, and drive up the federal debt.

[The Minsky Moment]

The article is not a model of clarity, but it seems like it is saying that Senate Republicans are considering proposing a fake "budget" in order to get around Senate rules that would otherwise delay their assault on ACA.  I.e. they are contemplated a "budget" where all the items are arbitrary except for the ACA repeal.

[Tamas]

They really ARE anxious to pretend the 8 years with a N-word President never happened.

[The Brain]

Nucular?

[CountDeMoney]

They really ARE anxious to pretend the 8 years with a N-word President never happened.

If the GOP hardliners really are willing to eat a $1 trillion deficit in order to take the ACA off the map, then it's not really about the government subsidies and fiscal responsibility for the debt, now is it?

[Razgovory]

They really ARE anxious to pretend the 8 years with a N-word President never happened.

I saw the other night some right winger chortling how this was the ultimate "humiliation" of Obama.

[Valmy]

The article is not a model of clarity, but it seems like it is saying that Senate Republicans are considering proposing a fake "budget" in order to get around Senate rules that would otherwise delay their assault on ACA.  I.e. they are contemplated a "budget" where all the items are arbitrary except for the ACA repeal.

So it is a bogus budget just for parliamentary rules shenanigans?

Not sure whether to be concerned about this or not.

[derspiess]

<chortle>

[Valmy]

<chortle>

What? I mean if it in actuality has nothing to do with the actual budget and is just there for some sort of nonsense procedural deal then that would be a difference yes?

[Admiral Yi]

What? I mean if it in actuality has nothing to do with the actual budget and is just there for some sort of nonsense procedural deal then that would be a difference yes?

See Razzberry's post. 

[Valmy]

What? I mean if it in actuality has nothing to do with the actual budget and is just there for some sort of nonsense procedural deal then that would be a difference yes?

See Razzberry's post. 

Ah.

See you really need to quote the post you are responding to if it is not the one directly above it 

[derspiess]

Meh, I was on my phone. 

[Syt]

"PresidentialTrump"

https://twitter.com/MatureTrumpTwts

[dps]

They really ARE anxious to pretend the 8 years with a N-word President never happened.

If the GOP hardliners really are willing to eat a $1 trillion deficit in order to take the ACA off the map, then it's not really about the government subsidies and fiscal responsibility for the debt, now is it?

I can't speak for the GOP leadership, but the cost of Obamacare was only part of the reason for my opposition to it. 

[MadImmortalMan]

what do we do.

Circumvent.