What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tamas

Quote from: grumbler on December 02, 2022, 10:17:19 AMTrump loses his appeal to 11th Circuit, which unanimously decides that Canon had no authority to appoint a special master.  Canon gets especially slammed in the decision.  All three judges appointed by Republicans, two of them by Trump himself.

He also lost, in DC Circuit, his claims that his lawyers testifying in front of Jan 6 Committee could invoke executive privilege at will.  They'll be back.

Very bad legal day for Trump.

You know what, I was thinking, this decision aligns very well with how Trump seems to be losing GOP adoration and focus. He could be all kinds of trouble if he won't end up being their candidate in 2024 but decides to run independent. Having "the Democrats" send him to prison would be a far, far superior outcome for them.

DGuller

I've been saying for a long while that at some point Trump will become convenient for Republicans to disassociate from, once he's no longer useful.  I've been badly wrong about it for a while, but maybe I was wrong only on the timing.

Razgovory

Quote from: Tamas on December 02, 2022, 10:39:41 AM
Quote from: grumbler on December 02, 2022, 10:17:19 AMTrump loses his appeal to 11th Circuit, which unanimously decides that Canon had no authority to appoint a special master.  Canon gets especially slammed in the decision.  All three judges appointed by Republicans, two of them by Trump himself.

He also lost, in DC Circuit, his claims that his lawyers testifying in front of Jan 6 Committee could invoke executive privilege at will.  They'll be back.

Very bad legal day for Trump.

You know what, I was thinking, this decision aligns very well with how Trump seems to be losing GOP adoration and focus. He could be all kinds of trouble if he won't end up being their candidate in 2024 but decides to run independent. Having "the Democrats" send him to prison would be a far, far superior outcome for them.
It's what they are betting on.  Democrats get rid of Trump while Republicans defend him.  That way they get to have their cake and eat it too.  They tried this before after the insurrection but it didn't work.  I don't think it will work this time either.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

alfred russel

Quote from: DGuller on December 02, 2022, 10:45:15 AMI've been saying for a long while that at some point Trump will become convenient for Republicans to disassociate from, once he's no longer useful.  I've been badly wrong about it for a while, but maybe I was wrong only on the timing.

I said this the day after the midterms...Trump is done. It is one thing when he is winning elections, it is another when he is losing what should have been layups.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

Barrister

Quote from: DGuller on December 02, 2022, 10:45:15 AMI've been saying for a long while that at some point Trump will become convenient for Republicans to disassociate from, once he's no longer useful.  I've been badly wrong about it for a while, but maybe I was wrong only on the timing.

Trump still maintains the fanatical loyalty of a sizeable percentage of the GOP base though.

I think we've seen in 2022 that Trump's support is not necessarily enough to get Republicans elected in the general, but it is enough to win the GOP nomination.  Trump himself still has to be the odd-on favourite to be the GOP nominee.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Habbaku

Trump as the nominee would be a godsend this time around, but perhaps still too risky to actually desire.
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

Josquius

#32391
Fingers crossed he does a lot of damage in running for the nomination  however.
██████
██████
██████

Barrister

Am I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Josquius

Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 06:04:15 PMAm I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...

Sure. It'd also be nice if fusion power was finally cracked and cancer cured.
██████
██████
██████

Jacob

Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 06:04:15 PMAm I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...

I'm hoping for serious, not-crazy, not-evil.

DGuller

Quote from: Josquius on December 02, 2022, 06:10:53 PM
Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 06:04:15 PMAm I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...

Sure. It'd also be nice if fusion power was finally cracked and cancer cured.
:hmm: It would indeed be nice, no?  What's the catch?

OttoVonBismarck

#32396
Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 04:33:35 PM
Quote from: DGuller on December 02, 2022, 10:45:15 AMI've been saying for a long while that at some point Trump will become convenient for Republicans to disassociate from, once he's no longer useful.  I've been badly wrong about it for a while, but maybe I was wrong only on the timing.

Trump still maintains the fanatical loyalty of a sizeable percentage of the GOP base though.

I think we've seen in 2022 that Trump's support is not necessarily enough to get Republicans elected in the general, but it is enough to win the GOP nomination.  Trump himself still has to be the odd-on favourite to be the GOP nominee.

The GOP uses a hodge podge of selection systems in the primaries, but the majority are quasi-first past the post, where the highest vote getter takes most, and sometimes winner take all--particularly the last third of states on the calendar I believe deliberately tilt towards winner take all to provide a decisive winner down the stretch.

The typical first past the post problem thus arises, the same one that made Trump impossible to beat in 2015/16--as long as Trump is the plurality candidate he will amass more and more delegates, and by the time the field narrows to him and one challenger, it is very likely he will mathematically be unbeatable. Up to the point where this happens he probably only needs 35% of the primary votes, assuming a decently robust field of challengers--and I see no reason to assume we won't literally have DeSantis, Pompeo, Haley, Rubio, Cruz and a number of others out there.

To beat Trump the Republicans need powerful and incredibly egotistical Republican politicians to foreswear a run for the Presidency and coalesce in unison behind DeSantis (the best candidate to beat Trump and probably their best national candidate period.) We'll see if that happens. It somewhat did in the Democratic primary in 2020 when Klobuchar and Buttigieg dropped out to coalesce the moderate vote behind Biden and knee cap Bernie.

Sophie Scholl

Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 06:04:15 PMAm I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...
Do they have anyone left who qualifies and has any chance whatsoever of winning? The Trump era of the party has pretty much destroyed any relatively moderate or civil people and has encouraged everyone else to sink to the lowest possible level to keep up with Trump and company.
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Sophie Scholl on December 03, 2022, 01:10:47 AMDo they have anyone left who qualifies and has any chance whatsoever of winning? The Trump era of the party has pretty much destroyed any relatively moderate or civil people and has encouraged everyone else to sink to the lowest possible level to keep up with Trump and company.

Maybe Mitt.

Josquius

Quote from: DGuller on December 02, 2022, 07:46:29 PM
Quote from: Josquius on December 02, 2022, 06:10:53 PM
Quote from: Barrister on December 02, 2022, 06:04:15 PMAm I crazy for hoping that the GOP nominates a serious and not-crazy candidate so US voters have two viable candidates to pick from?

I don't think I'm crazy...

Sure. It'd also be nice if fusion power was finally cracked and cancer cured.
:hmm: It would indeed be nice, no?  What's the catch?

It's not happening anytime soon.
██████
██████
██████