And we're back!
Started by Zanza, May 11, 2016, 10:48:15 AM
Quote from: PDH on May 29, 2016, 03:36:54 PMCiv IV returned the game to very interesting fun - Civ III was too flawed. Civ II was Civ I on steroids, fulfilling all the promises people wanted after playing the original for 10,000 hours and ruining their lives. Civ II remains the best for many because of this - it took the game that was inspired by ASCII Empire and made it complete.However, I find that with all the expansions, Civ V has been the most fun for me since Civ I (nothing can compare to discovering that and almost ruining my graduate school). I was far more lukewarm to it before the add-ons, but once those came about the game felt more alive than any other since making my Mongol Chariot Army and conquering the world in Civ I.
Quote from: Monoriu on May 29, 2016, 04:43:49 PM3 is the weakest of the bunch. Actually 1 is weak too but back then there wasn't much to compare with it. It only felt weak in retrospect. When I played it, it was the best game ever. 2 is 1 with much better graphics and more of everything. No significant change to the rules though. Don't fix it if it ain't broken.
Quote from: The Brain on June 03, 2016, 10:33:50 AMI can't imagine what your agenda will be.
Quote from: PJL on July 26, 2016, 05:27:03 PMWTF at the French leader. I actually had to look her up. They have several great leaders, like Louis XIV, Napoleons I & III, De Gaulle etc. Heck I would even have accepted Joan of Arc. But Catherine de Medici is too obscure for a game like Civ.
Page created in 0.026 seconds with 19 queries.