News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Would you want a self driving car?

Started by Savonarola, April 27, 2016, 12:54:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Assuming that you could afford one, and the technology was mature, would you want a self driving car?

Yes
28 (73.7%)
No
10 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 38

Eddie Teach

Quote from: DGuller on April 27, 2016, 03:49:38 PM
:yes: Car ownership is extremely inefficient.  The car spends most of the time just sitting there parked and rotting.  It's necessary when it needs to be near a driver, but otherwise it's an idiotic state of things.

Do cars that are driven constantly go longer (mileagewise) than cars driven 10-20000 miles a year before breaking down?
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

dps

Fuck no, I wouldn't want a self-driving car, for largely the same reason I want a computer with a processor instead of just a box that connects to the internet and lets me access the cloud--I don't want the loss of personal autonomy.

What I would want is to be able to afford a chauffeur for the times I don't want to drive myself.

Habbaku

Quote from: Iormlund on April 27, 2016, 03:39:39 PM
Being driven by a bot is a small price to pay to have everyone else taken off the wheel.

:)
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

Habbaku

Quote from: dps on April 27, 2016, 04:02:32 PM
Fuck no, I wouldn't want a self-driving car, for largely the same reason I want a computer with a processor instead of just a box that connects to the internet and lets me access the cloud--I don't want the loss of personal autonomy.

What I would want is to be able to afford a chauffeur for the times I don't want to drive myself.

Do you wear a seatbelt while driving?
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

alfred russel

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 27, 2016, 03:52:42 PM
Quote from: DGuller on April 27, 2016, 03:49:38 PM
:yes: Car ownership is extremely inefficient.  The car spends most of the time just sitting there parked and rotting.  It's necessary when it needs to be near a driver, but otherwise it's an idiotic state of things.

Do cars that are driven constantly go longer (mileagewise) than cars driven 10-20000 miles a year before breaking down?

Maintenance costs are probably reduced - some of the maintenance schedules of most cars are based on time. Also - a reduction in exposure to elements is a big deal--I would expect a car that travels 200k miles in a year to have less costs than a car that travels 200k in 20. That is 19 less summers and winters to endure. Plus maintenance can be more efficiently managed through fleets rather than on an ad hoc basis by individual owners. Also cars will stay newer, and more up to date, with the latest safety equipment etc.


A major savings is the reduction in car storage expenses. People won't need garages or driveways. There won't be a need for parking lots, parking decks, or on street parking. During off peak hours, cars can go out of service outside of cities where space is not at such a premium.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

dps

Quote from: Habbaku on April 27, 2016, 04:03:27 PM
Quote from: dps on April 27, 2016, 04:02:32 PM
Fuck no, I wouldn't want a self-driving car, for largely the same reason I want a computer with a processor instead of just a box that connects to the internet and lets me access the cloud--I don't want the loss of personal autonomy.

What I would want is to be able to afford a chauffeur for the times I don't want to drive myself.

Do you wear a seatbelt while driving?

Yes, but I'm opposed to laws making it mandatory.

garbon

Quote from: dps on April 27, 2016, 04:11:53 PM
Quote from: Habbaku on April 27, 2016, 04:03:27 PM
Quote from: dps on April 27, 2016, 04:02:32 PM
Fuck no, I wouldn't want a self-driving car, for largely the same reason I want a computer with a processor instead of just a box that connects to the internet and lets me access the cloud--I don't want the loss of personal autonomy.

What I would want is to be able to afford a chauffeur for the times I don't want to drive myself.

Do you wear a seatbelt while driving?

Yes, but I'm opposed to laws making it mandatory.

:rolleyes:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

DGuller

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 27, 2016, 03:52:42 PM
Quote from: DGuller on April 27, 2016, 03:49:38 PM
:yes: Car ownership is extremely inefficient.  The car spends most of the time just sitting there parked and rotting.  It's necessary when it needs to be near a driver, but otherwise it's an idiotic state of things.

Do cars that are driven constantly go longer (mileagewise) than cars driven 10-20000 miles a year before breaking down?
I don't know that for a fact, but I would be extremely surprised if it weren't the case.  Not all wear-and-tear is a function of miles.  Some of it is a function of time (rubber rots), and a lot of it is a function of the number of cold starts a car goes through.

Zanza

Yes. I've driven the semi autonomous cars of today and I didn't miss anything e.g. when just leaning back in a traffic jam.

Eddie Teach

Ok, but what about distance between passengers? A privately owned car will be parked right where the owner needs it. No matter how advanced the system, nor how heavy the usage, the public car will have to travel to pick people up. This can be a large portion of its mileage, especially when people are just going to the grocery store a couple miles away.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Gups

We've had self driving trains here since the 1980s,  I think they are quite common elsewhere too, mainly light rail. No accidents as far as I know.

DGuller

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 27, 2016, 04:24:10 PM
Ok, but what about distance between passengers? A privately owned car will be parked right where the owner needs it. No matter how advanced the system, nor how heavy the usage, the public car will have to travel to pick people up. This can be a large portion of its mileage, especially when people are just going to the grocery store a couple miles away.
How long does an Uber car travel to pick up the passenger?  How will automated cars be different?

Eddie Teach

Quote from: DGuller on April 27, 2016, 04:29:09 PM
How long does an Uber car travel to pick up the passenger?

No idea. Never used it. I'd assume it won't need to go so far downtown as it does outside the beltway.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

alfred russel

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 27, 2016, 04:24:10 PM
Ok, but what about distance between passengers? A privately owned car will be parked right where the owner needs it. No matter how advanced the system, nor how heavy the usage, the public car will have to travel to pick people up. This can be a large portion of its mileage, especially when people are just going to the grocery store a couple miles away.

If there are fleets of taxis all over the city, that distance should not be large. Also, even in the current world, where the uber/lyft fleets are a small minority of cars on the road, there are experiments with ride sharing. It seems likely that will be an option--you say you want to go from your suburban house to the city center at rush hour, you can be matched with people taking similar trips at the same time and reduce the cost.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

alfred russel

ET, this is an unusual line of argument you are taking. If people have a chance to avoid purchasing a very large and bulky ~$25k piece of machinery because they can rent one when needed at even roughly the same long term cost (though I suspect it will be less), they will do so.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014