News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The Off Topic Topic

Started by Korea, March 10, 2009, 06:24:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Valmy

Quote from: Tyr on January 26, 2021, 11:34:26 AM
I have heard good things of Austin I must say.
Though the prospect of living in a desert surrounded by gun nuts where you must drive to get anywhere says it certainly aint for me.

Only the very western part of Texas is desert. But I guess you are talking about Arizona there :hmm:
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Sheilbh

Baroness Floella Benjamin has had her vaccine :w00t:
Let's bomb Russia!

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: Syt on January 26, 2021, 08:16:19 AM
Ah, now I see it. :)

(I don't think I've seen him with glasses before?)

That's '80s Chirac for you. :)


Sheilbh

Not late 80s sexy Chirac! :P
Let's bomb Russia!

Valmy

Quote from: Sheilbh on January 26, 2021, 04:42:26 AM
40 years and the only non-Tory who's won an election is still Blair :ph34r:

No wonder Labour voters hate him so much.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Duque de Bragança



Better than late, 2010s Chirac anyways.

DGuller

Quote from: Syt on January 26, 2021, 01:37:27 AM


While technically true, not sure I would count Scheel in Germany, as he only filled in for 9 days between Brandt and Schmidt.
I like how neat and orderly the German column is, relatively speaking anyway.  :)

Valmy

The Third Republic is not impressed by this tiny list of French Governments in 75 years.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

crazy canuck

I think they are talking about election wins rather than governments - naming the same leader (at least in the British Parliamentary system) as successive different governments does not make much sense.

Josquius

Quote from: Valmy on January 26, 2021, 11:35:47 AM
Quote from: Tyr on January 26, 2021, 11:34:26 AM
I have heard good things of Austin I must say.
Though the prospect of living in a desert surrounded by gun nuts where you must drive to get anywhere says it certainly aint for me.

Only the very western part of Texas is desert. But I guess you are talking about Arizona there :hmm:
My definition of desert falls some way short of the scientific definition. :p
██████
██████
██████

Eddie Teach

Same here. Steppes = might as well be desert.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

ulmont

Quote from: crazy canuck on January 26, 2021, 02:23:45 PM
I think they are talking about election wins rather than governments - naming the same leader (at least in the British Parliamentary system) as successive different governments does not make much sense.

That makes the US look incredibly stable with only 20 over that span (I ended before 2020 because it shows May rather than Johnson), with only two breaks from the 4 year pattern:

Trump
Obama
Obama
Bush
Bush
Clinton
Clinton
Bush (not that one)
Reagan
Reagan
Carter
Ford (following the resignation of Nixon)
Nixon
Nixon
Johnson
Johnson (following the assassination of Kennedy)
Kennedy
Eisenhower
Eisenhower
Truman

grumbler

Quote from: Eddie Teach on January 26, 2021, 10:39:22 AM
Nobody goes to lives in California anymore, it's too crowded.

You gotta update the joke when you re-apply it.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

crazy canuck

Quote from: ulmont on January 26, 2021, 03:14:25 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 26, 2021, 02:23:45 PM
I think they are talking about election wins rather than governments - naming the same leader (at least in the British Parliamentary system) as successive different governments does not make much sense.

That makes the US look incredibly stable with only 20 over that span (I ended before 2020 because it shows May rather than Johnson), with only two breaks from the 4 year pattern:

Trump
Obama
Obama
Bush
Bush
Clinton
Clinton
Bush (not that one)
Reagan
Reagan
Carter
Ford (following the resignation of Nixon)
Nixon
Nixon
Johnson
Johnson (following the assassination of Kennedy)
Kennedy
Eisenhower
Eisenhower
Truman

That is really my point.  the comparison of how many elections are held doesn't make sense without the context of the constitutional framework.

If for example the US had the equivalent of confidence votes they would be holding elections monthly  :P 


ok perhaps just annually.

Syt

https://philipmould.com/news/154-ground-breaking-discovery-of-rare-portrait-of-henri-iii-conservation-uncovers-first-ever-signature-by-jean-decourt/

Quote"Ground-breaking" discovery of rare portrait of Henri III, King of France

Conservation uncovers first ever signature by Jean Decourt

Both the artist and the subject of this intricately detailed, jewel-like miniature painting - bought 'unseen' during lockdown in 2020 - are exceptional discoveries.

The 57mm tall likeness was originally described as Sir Walter Raleigh, but experts at Philip Mould & Co soon discovered it was an image of Henri III, King of France (1551-1589), whose remaining contemporary images are extremely scarce.

However, a second transformative discovery was made when a conservator opened the painting's delicate frame and found the signature, 'Decourt' along with the date '1578', on the reverse.

Unusually, despite Decourt's high profile and status at the time, no signed portrait had been unequivocally ascribed to this highly significant court artist. Until now...

Jean Decourt (c.1530-c.1585) was a remarkable painter, with an exquisite eye for detail, who had an illustrious career. On the death of Francois Clouet (1501-1572), Decourt assumed the role of official court artist to King Charles IX of France, albeit he is also documented to have been the official artist for Mary, Queen of Scots (1542-1587) and recorded as painting Elizabeth I (1533 - 1603) and her favourite, Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester (1532 - 1588), during trips to England in 1565/6.

Henri had been elected King of Poland, in recognition of his military valour, but was recalled to Paris in 1574 to replace his dead brother, Charles IX. Due to his inability to prevent the continued escalation of the Wars of Religion (1562-98) and his increasing unpopularity as a monarch, Henri was assassinated (notable in itself as the first act of regicide of a French monarch) - and his reputation suffered further during the French Revolution; when it was dangerous to own royal portraits, which for subsequent centuries, all but wiped his face from history.

The life - and in particular, the sexuality - of Henri III has long been discussed and debated by historians. 16th century writers often referenced his fondness for wearing women's clothing at court entertainments and for his male companions, dubbed at the time 'mignons', who slavishly copied the king's dress. Indeed, the contemporary diarist, Pierre de L'Estoile's (1546-1611) description of the mignons - who wore "their hair long, curled and recurled by artifice, with little bonnets of velvet on top of it like whores in the brothels, and the ruffles on their linen shirts [ruffs] are of starched finery and one-half foot long, so their heads look like St John's on a platter" - could equally be applied to the fashions worn by Henri in this miniature.

It was also L'Estoile who commented on the king's own fondness for cross-dressing: "The king made jousts, tournaments, ballets, and a great many masquerades, where he was found ordinarily dressed as a woman, working his doublet and exposing his throat, there wearing a collar of pearls and three collars of linen, two ruffled and one turned upside down, in the same way as was then worn by the ladies of the court."

This delicate, sensitive and incredibly realistic likeness of Henri III contains all the hallmarks of Decourt's style, in the extraordinary meticulousness of the details, the particular attention paid to the clothing, the jewels treated in volume with their cast shadows, the incredibly lifelike, modelling of the face (which is slightly pale) and in the artist's habit of placing the reflection of light in the pupil of the eye, rather than the iris as Clouet did.

Exactly how a miniature made in 16th century Paris ended up in a country sale in the UK is now the subject of further research, although it is believed the work might have crossed the Channel during the French Revolution, escaping the destruction which befell so many royal and aristocratic portraits.

Celine Cachaud, portrait miniatures specialist, now working at the Institut national d'histoire de l'art with the Musée du Louvre, assisted with the research into the portrait last year. In her opinion, she affirms: "We can now firmly and finally imprint 16th century royal portraiture with Decourt's name. This groundbreaking discovery will have a major impact on the study of late Valois portraiture and miniature painting in years to come."

The portrait of Henri was very likely to have been painted in the Louvre, which was the royal residence at the same time that the miniature was created.

Philip Mould says: "This work is a French National Treasure - a hugely significant unpublished image of a misunderstood King, and confirmation of Jean Decourt's immense talent. It would be wonderful if it could 'come home' to Paris, as I believe that is where it truly belongs. We have therefore given the Louvre the first opportunity to purchase it."


I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.