Condom piercer's sex crime appeal goes to Supreme Court

Started by jimmy olsen, November 10, 2013, 10:08:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Camerus

It seems rather straightforward to me that *deliberate* condom sabotage invalidates consent, so a rape charge seems reasonable.

Of course, generally establishing deliberate condom sabotage would likely be extremely difficult, but here the accused was kind enough to confess...

Tonitrus

I think equating "condom sabotage' to rape is bringing down the seriousness of rape...which should be a capital  crime.

Grinning_Colossus

I'd say that it definitely counts as sexual assault, given that child support laws give the woman enormous coercive power in such situations.
Quis futuit ipsos fututores?

Josquius

Quote from: jimmy olsen on November 10, 2013, 11:08:22 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 10, 2013, 10:35:19 PM
I'd agree it's not rape. Rape is about sex, not pregnancy.
The sex was fully consensual, the pregnancy was not.
I'd agree with calling it fraud. Sexual fraud.... Should that be a thing?
The trouble I see with this is it could be opening a can of worms every time a bitch has an unplanned pregnancy.
Classy
What?
The kind of woman who would try and take advantage of this ruling to screw over a guy would be pretty firmly in bitch territory
██████
██████
██████

Siege



"All men are created equal, then some become infantry."

"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't."

"Laissez faire et laissez passer, le monde va de lui même!"


The Brain

Quote from: Siege on November 11, 2013, 02:02:17 AM
I refuse to post on this thread!

Ha. Little do you realize that you, without knowing, unwittingly did the same! The irony almost unbearable!
Women want me. Men want to be with me.