Quote from: Syt on Today at 02:45:19 AMBecause I have no impulse control I ordered: https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/356080/the-elder-scrolls-betrayal-of-the-second-era
It's on backorder, but should arrive "soon"(TM)
your words were rewilding. Haphazardly planting some trees in a field is not making a forest, nor is it rewilding. The diversification won't be there for good habitat. Sure the deer will be happy for a while when the trees are saplings for the free food, and maybe mice will be there, but not much more.
). Not the trip itself, that was fun, the fact we had to volunteer to graduate. Hadn't thought about it in forever. It's been over 25 years, and they're probably just starting to thin out some spots now for second planting. Quote from: HVC on December 14, 2025, 04:24:16 AMAlso not true, planting trees requires quite a few years of stewardship until they're large enough. Be it weeding until they've grown enough not to be shaded, and perhaps more difficult keeping deer away from saplings. Deer are opportunist dicks. Besides that have you seen planted forests? Diversity is not their strong suit. Not even talking about the mono culture of the trees themselves, but the undergrowth is often poor and not actually that great for wildlife. That's why reforesting is often heavily managed. At least in this area fast grown trees (often pine) are planted to create shade canopies then decades later thinned out and deciduous trees planted and managed. Again, over decades. Not exactly hands off. You're better off letting margin land on existing forest become colonized, but that takes a very long time. In the meanwhile you have a weed field that fucks over neighbour farmers. Anyway, I might be mistaken, but when I think Texas I don't think verdant forests![]()
).Page created in 0.053 seconds with 16 queries.