Quote from: The Minsky Moment on Today at 10:28:16 AMThe Clintons were a bluff that failed. Trump & Co hoped that the Clintons would defy it and that Democrats in the House would rally behind the Clintons and support obstruction of an obviously political subpoena, thus setting precedent for others to defy such subpoenasin the future. Some old-line Dems fell right into the trap, but others broke ranks and joined the threat of contempt sanctions (the right thing to do to preserve the House's prerogative), and the Clintons conceded the point. Now, the Republicans are stuck with a deposition that they never really wanted to take.
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 10:41:39 AMI think Muslims (including people who are not Muslim but "appear" Muslim) experience discrimination, both on a structural and sort of "everyday" level that is somewhat analogous to racism. I think that's what Islamophobia usefully describes.
I think it's a huge problem in Europe, including the UK. I think part of the problem is that in the framing of it I think we are downstream of the US - part of this is simply that in the US there are people who have thought through aspects of racism more and have expressed that. But I think that does mean that some of the framing is from the American experience which I think understandably centres on anti-black racism and white supremacy in the context of a slave society. Whereas I think Islamophobia is as important to the development of European identities (I think the Islamic world is, to use the overly-academic phrase, Europe's constitutive other) - and interacts with race - but I don't think we have had the same level of thought (or activism actually) in this area. So the framing that can apply sometimes fits uneasily and in a way that can give European bigots a bit of an out.
Is it right to call Islamophobia racism? Probably not. Is that definitional argument much more than angels dancing on the head of a pin? Not really.
Edit: I'd add the leading anti-Islamophobia group in the UK (equivalent to the Community Safety Trust) condemned the Green ads as promoting sectarian division. As I mentioned and garbon flagged all the big parties have some record of this - I don't think it will lead anywhere good if the parties are playing with that stuff every 4-5 years because a vote's a vote.
Quote"when I wasn't wearing a hijab I was just some ordinary white girl from New York City. Wearing hijab made you know that I was Muslim."
Quote from: Norgy on February 25, 2026, 09:10:33 AMNo, we still hate Spanish fishermen.![]()
Quote from: HVC on February 25, 2026, 10:17:37 PMSo they're implementing a caste system?
Quote from: Sheilbh on Today at 12:31:24 PMI agree on there's not much you can do on how people reach their decision. But the flipside is you should be pretty militant on the secrecy of the ballot box. So local council staff should absolutely be enforcing that.
Quote from: Valmy on Today at 12:19:07 PMBeyond insuring that only one person at a time is in a voting booth and their vote remains secret I don't think there is anything more you can do about that. It is a person's right to let somebody else tell them how to vote and vote accordingly.I agree on there's not much you can do on how people reach their decision. But the flipside is you should be pretty militant on the secrecy of the ballot box. So local council staff should absolutely be enforcing that. There is a bit of a row about this as the council say these monitors didn't inform them on the day, the monitors say they did. If the council were turning a blind eye to men escorting their wives into the ballot booth and going with them that's an issue.
Quote from: Valmy on Today at 12:14:31 PMQuote from: garbon on Today at 12:13:04 PMYes that is the whole complaint. It is illegal.
Well ok I guess I agree with Reform on this![]()
But "family voting" is a weird term for this.

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 16 queries.