Quote from: Jacob on Today at 12:42:34 PMSaw another article on a place where AI is making things crappier - Amazon self-publishing. It's always had a problem with content that was essentially (at best) wikipedia articles uploaded as books for suckers to buy. But now - according to the article - that market place is completely flooded with shoddy AI generated content. This shuts down a venue for aspiring and unrecognized authors to publish their work.Looking on the bright side, maybe the return of curation is exactly what we need. Social media with its lack of curation may have sounded great in theory, but it put democracy on the ropes.
I guess more generally, AI is likely going to render non-curated or lightly curated places for content non-viable as the return on investment from flooding them with low effort derivative AI generated content is going to be significant enough that non-AI generated work will tend to be drowned out (or not submitted at all).
Quote from: Josquius on Today at 03:58:57 PMQuote from: Gups on Today at 03:37:09 PMNo you didn't. Cuts in corporation tax and income tax applied countrywide. Not just to the City (who had a hugely adverse reaction to something you claim benefited them)
I was expecting you to come up with some kind of bonfire of financial regulations.
Obviously taxes are national. Do you really think it possible a tax could be set just for part of the country?
What she was able to do in her five minutes in power is just a fraction of what she wanted to do. "Unshackling the city", "if London does well Britain does well", "Singapore on Thames".
It's just wrong to suggest she didn't very much have a intent grounded in neoliberalism and trickle down economics that put the city at the core.
Quote from: Gups on Today at 03:37:09 PMNo you didn't. Cuts in corporation tax and income tax applied countrywide. Not just to the City (who had a hugely adverse reaction to something you claim benefited them)
I was expecting you to come up with some kind of bonfire of financial regulations.
Quote from: Josquius on Today at 02:48:23 PMWhat we did have was a pretty clear threat to a business not from the person employed but from those shouting about them being anti semites.What were they threatening to do?
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on Today at 03:08:41 PMAnonymous communication is an ancient and sacrosanct thing. Many of the U.S. Founding Fathers wrote some of their most important things under nom de plume's like Publius.
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on Today at 03:08:41 PMAnonymous communication is an ancient and sacrosanct thing. Many of the U.S. Founding Fathers wrote some of their most important things under nom de plume's like Publius.
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on Today at 02:52:31 PMThe core point is that a business should not be required to employ someone who harms their business, it really isn't controversial.
Maybe it is "mean" for a group to specialize in making businesses aware that they employ such people, and publicizing the facts, but the business is not wrong for acting. And frankly, these people the StopAntisemitism group are going after have done much to deserve their being publicized. You don't need to express views like that on social media or in public.
Page created in 0.191 seconds with 15 queries.