News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-23 and Invasion

Started by mongers, August 06, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Minsky Moment

Another narrative that denies non-Western actors of agency and making them playthings of Western preferences. It's not hard to understand why Ukraine would be reluctant to accept Russian assurances of security guarantees, given that Russia violated its treaty with Ukraine in 2014 and then again in 2022.  I don't think you to invoke the persuasive power of Boris Johnson's high wattage mind to understand why Ukraine might not be convinced by "third time's the charm."  One also doesn't need to search for Western influence to understand why the revelation of war crimes at Bucha might have transformed domestic politics in a way to limit Zelensky's negotiating flexibility.

And of course the whole narrative assumes that the Russian flunky negotiators were on the level and could deliver a Putin signature, as opposed to being engaged in a time-buying exercise for Russia to regroup and implement Plan C.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Zoupa

russia wanted recognition of their "annexations" as part of the peace treaty. It was always a non-starter.

Josquius

The conspiracy nut version that the west forced Ukraine to fight on is of course stupid.

But it's certainly valid to say if the west hadn't promised to keep supporting ukraine it would have been in a very different situation.

Still annoying that you keep getting people pushing this idea that just surrendering is somehow a solution.
██████
██████
██████

Tamas

Quote from: Josquius on Today at 01:12:35 AMThe conspiracy nut version that the west forced Ukraine to fight on is of course stupid.

But it's certainly valid to say if the west hadn't promised to keep supporting ukraine it would have been in a very different situation.

Still annoying that you keep getting people pushing this idea that just surrendering is somehow a solution.

Yes the problem here is that this article highlights that western support was needed for Ukraine to fight on (duh) but does so in a negative way - that western support thus prevented peace.


The Brain

Responsible government can never make peace their top priority.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Sheilbh

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 22, 2024, 04:21:35 PMAnother narrative that denies non-Western actors of agency and making them playthings of Western preferences. It's not hard to understand why Ukraine would be reluctant to accept Russian assurances of security guarantees, given that Russia violated its treaty with Ukraine in 2014 and then again in 2022.  I don't think you to invoke the persuasive power of Boris Johnson's high wattage mind to understand why Ukraine might not be convinced by "third time's the charm."  One also doesn't need to search for Western influence to understand why the revelation of war crimes at Bucha might have transformed domestic politics in a way to limit Zelensky's negotiating flexibility.
Yes. It is always striking how many who talk about the importance of and their support for "multipolarity" also have zero interest in the actual agency of other countries and peoples.
Let's bomb Russia!

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Zoupa on April 22, 2024, 07:46:57 PMrussia wanted recognition of their "annexations" as part of the peace treaty. It was always a non-starter.

The fig leaf of this new narrative, as reported in the Foreign Affairs article, is the claim that during the Istanbul talks, the Russian negotiators discussed a communique text in which the status of Crimea and the Donbas would be addressed during future discussions. But it's hard to see why any rational person aware of Russia's past conduct would take such a proposal seriously, with or without Boris Johnson's 2 cents thrown in.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Tamas

Yeah it's quite sad that even after all this the moment Russia pushes a "this is the West's fault, after all" narrative, so many people jump on the chance to engage in this weird arrogant self-flaggelation our post-imperialist societies (or rather our intelligentsia) like.

Valmy

#16628
Quote from: Tamas on April 22, 2024, 03:56:12 PMAnalysis of the 2022 negotiations: Ukraine didn't agree to a cease fire because of the Western nations' scepticism about Russia's intentions and their commitment to support Ukraine.

This analysis is based on statements made by Ukraine? Or is this just guessing?

Just skeptical Ukraine was all prepared to give up but then a vague commitment by the West convinced them to sacrifice tens of thousands of their own people.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."