Poll

How would you vote on Britain remaining in the EU?

British- Remain
11 (12.1%)
British - Leave
7 (7.7%)
Other European - Remain
19 (20.9%)
Other European - Leave
6 (6.6%)
ROTW - Remain
29 (31.9%)
ROTW - Leave
19 (20.9%)

Total Members Voted: 91

Author Topic: Brexit  (Read 386787 times)

celedhring

  • Incan Torpedo Boat Commander
  • ************
  • Posts: 9807
  • Not capturing Amiens.
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9135 on: April 12, 2019, 03:49:14 pm »
Yesterday I witnessed the first real life usage of Brexitear. We were at a party, somebody said goodbye to everybody (hugs and all) saying he had to leave because stuff, but then he stayed on for like an hour more, and people started joking he was "brexiting us".

Qwertee is having a t-shirt for that tomorrow (I think):



 :lol:

Razgovory

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • Neil
  • **************
  • Posts: 34310
  • Madman of Languish
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9136 on: April 12, 2019, 06:36:58 pm »
Well I'm just glad that this bullshit hasn't screwed up Tyr and Tamas' life yet.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

"I love how Raz just becomes the caricature for exactly what he is claiming doesn't actually exist...and he doesn't even know it! He is 100% oblivious to the irony of his own statements." - Berkut telling a lie.

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Tyr

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • **************
  • Posts: 17970
  • In the end we will win
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9137 on: April 17, 2019, 01:52:56 am »
This is pretty big. It's worse than we thought.
And likely to be swept under the carpet.

https://www.channel4.com/news/revealed-how-leave-eu-faked-migrant-footage
██████
██████
██████

The Brain

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • **************
  • Posts: 27048
  • All man
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9138 on: April 17, 2019, 04:26:01 am »
This is pretty big. It's worse than we thought.
And likely to be swept under the carpet.

https://www.channel4.com/news/revealed-how-leave-eu-faked-migrant-footage

Fake news.
You are gay.

Tamas

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • **************
  • Posts: 17828
  • we are not in Kansas anymore
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9139 on: April 17, 2019, 06:01:06 am »
Great summar imho:
https://politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/12/week-in-review-the-frazzlfication-ends-now-for-a-little-bit

Quote
OK, so breathe. And relax. There is, for the first time in a very long time, a lull in proceedings.

That was pretty brutal. That was three straight months of mainlined news, from first thing in the morning to last thing at night. News injected directly into the blood supply, to the point where it simply took over the circulatory system and we all became walking news creatures, cross and fatigued and well-informed to the point of mania.

We have somehow managed to pack two decade's worth of political stories into three months.

On January 15th, Theresa May's Brexit deal was defeated by a historic margin. Immediately afterwards, Jeremy Corbyn called a no-confidence vote, which he lost. Then the Malthouse Compromise was born, as a kind of release valve for MPs' desperate stupidity. The government responded by whipping in support of its evil twin, the Brady amendment, and won, thereby sabotaging its own negotiating strategy. Labour published a new Brexit strategy, which looked suspiciously like Norway Plus but was different to it in ways they were unable or unwilling to describe. The government then proceeded to lose a vote on the policy which MPs had forced on it the week before, driving British politics into a kind of post-modern chasm in which David Lynch became the creative director of parliament. Then a group of Labour and Tory MPs split from the party to form the Independent Group. May announced she would request a dual extension of Article 50 - short in the case of a deal and long if not. She later went back on this and requested only the short extension. She also secured an update to her deal with the Europeans which didn't really change anything. MPs promptly and unsurprisingly rejected it again. In response, the government put forward a convoluted motion on no-deal, whipped MPs to oppose an amendment which simplified it, lost, and had to therefore whip against its own motion even though it amounted to the exact policy it said it was pursuing anyway. Then anyone who still believed in parliamentary democracy decided maybe it wasn't such a great idea after all. Soon enough John Bercow popped up and refused to allow May to bring her deal back to the Commons a third time unless it was changed. May secured her first extension of Article 50, but then MPs passed an amendment taking control of the Brexit process, triggering a new bout of constitutional chaos. The Brexit process became a kind of executive dual carriageway, with the government pursing one strategy and parliament another. In a bid to get MPs to back her deal, May offered her own resignation as an incentive, seemingly oblivious to how logically and morally broken that was as a strategy. MPs, for their part, held a series of indicative votes and found no majority. May stripped her deal in two to get it past Bercow, put it before the Commons again, and lost again. MPs held more indicative votes and still could not find a majority. Pitiful broken toys scattered everywhere. May announced she would seek another Article 50 extension. Parliament passed a bill, independently of government, forcing her to do the thing she said she would do, given that her reputation for reliability at this stage was frankly not what it was. And then, finally, the EU offered an extension to October 31st. And now here we are. Three months later and about twelve hundred years older.


It is a quite extraordinary level of time and money and emotional stress to go through for no reason whatsoever. We are where we have always been, except that the whole world now thinks Britain is a laughing stock. Most Brexiters want to blame the government. Most Remainers want to blame Brexit. In reality both things are true. You can do stupid things well or you can do them badly. Brexit is stupid and the government has done it badly.

Journalists, politicians and close followers of the news are all knackered by this. It's not really the hours, although they are long, or the incessant nature of events. It's not even that weird thing Brexit does where you feel out the loop if you don't read the news one morning and yet somehow nothing ever actually changes.

It is the combination of constant developments plus emotional investment. Nearly everyone following this thing is properly involved in it. Some want no-deal, or May's deal, or Norway Plus, or a customs union, or Malthouse, whatever the hell that is, or a People's Vote, or straight revocation. They have a dog in the fight. Some of them - a great many in fact - are scheming egomaniacs. But for others, on both sides, there is a genuine concern about the country, a fear for its future, and a sense that their understanding of themselves as Brits is going through an upheaval. It is political and personal. And then there is the background thrum of abuse, like a distant drumbeat, forming an awful soundtrack to a horrible process.

There are so many actors in Brexit, and so many variables and processes, that it's hard for any one side to stay on top for long. The deepest despair can quickly shift to a moment of startling hope, and visa-versa. This constant chopping-and-changing of the fates is also profoundly exhausting.

Also, we're all sick of hating one another. People yearn to go back to a country that wasn't severed in half in this way. But they can't get back there. The map is lost.

There's no point doing sob-stories for politicians and journalists. That's not a tale anyone wants to read. But the lull in proceedings is important on a functional level. You do not want people making decisions when they are exhausted, emotional, and feeling under siege. That's just bad people management.

So the brief, blissful recess, from today until after Easter, should be genuinely embraced by those who make news, write news, or read it. They all need to make the most of it. There are precisely no reasons to feel optimistic that anyone will come back smarter, kinder or more principled from the break. But spring is here, you can feel the sun on your face, there'll be lots of chocolate soon and you'll see the family. Might as well be pointlessly optimistic for a bit.

mongers

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • **************
  • Posts: 15981
  • LLL.Rural Poverty
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9140 on: April 17, 2019, 07:31:05 am »
Can anyone remind me what this thing was about, haven't heard it on the news in a while.  :bowler:
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Tamas

  • Blessed by Valmy
  • **************
  • Posts: 17828
  • we are not in Kansas anymore
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9141 on: April 17, 2019, 09:11:20 am »
Can anyone remind me what this thing was about, haven't heard it on the news in a while.  :bowler:

You can tell just how pressing of an issue to leave truly is. Everyone has dropped the subject completely in an instant.

Richard Hakluyt

  • Can I Be: Ottoman Empire
  • ***********
  • Posts: 6139
Re: Brexit
« Reply #9142 on: April 17, 2019, 01:14:57 pm »
Haven't we left yet  :hmm: ?